"The case of Héctor Becerril deserves an outrage"

Glave describes as a travesty that Becerril was only prevented from participating in the parliamentary committees that will investigate the audios. He said that he should resign. He argues that his group is in agreement with the withdrawal of all the members of the National Council of Magistracy (CNM).

These days there has been talk of a possible question of trust that Caesar Villanueva would have to ask. Is it feasible?

I should ask before a kind of vote and we should talk about a state policy. I think you need to set clear priorities. Is this counterweight between the executive and the congress sustainable? New Peru said no from the first moment. As Veronika Mendoza and we have also said: the day that Mr. Villanueva came to ask our trust, we told him that changing the dates does not solve anything.

César Hildebrandt suggested that we advance the elections of everything …

That's what should be done. But the problem is that for this advancement of elections, we need to sit down and discuss the rules of the game of minimum electoral reform and minimal transitional reform. That Valentín Paniagua did It had a transition process and then called for elections, that is what Vizcarra should have badumed. He can always do it.

What steps did you take from your bench?

We had already asked for a commission of inquiry and that everyone should be included. We believe that this Friday can be reached. Hopefully we can take everyone off, but that does not end, what about substitutes? Several have already appeared in the audios and have not resigned. That the NJC members have made their positions available helps Congress to say that it becomes a ratification of trust and that it is not necessary to give it to a college student who has done badly, and this has been seen by everyone.

A first step is to remove the members of the NJC, but it worries the vote because many members of Congress are involved.

The new Peru requests withdrawal, but this must be done according to a minimal procedure.

What do we do with accesitarios?

I think they should not enter.

The NJC has just temporarily dismissed ONPE chief Adolfo Castillo. What do you think?

I think keeping it was even more serious. This is a person who was interviewed. Eye that they have not removed, they have left the subject in a half open thing that genuinely demonstrates that they do not badume the responsibility that touches them. Now the solution does not have to be partial, now we have to realize that we are entering a crisis of a very serious regime.

What will happen to MP Héctor Becerril, who was finally inhibited?

a mockery, he had to give up the commissions that have to do with this issue. On Tuesday, Indira Huilca filed a constitutional complaint against Mr. Becerril for the audios. The following day, Mr. Baltazar Morales confirmed that the audios are not sneakers, that there was a meeting at Mr. Guido Aguila's house and that he met there Becerril, who would have left on behalf from Fuerza Popular. This is very serious, because the Constitution would have been divided. In this case, deserve the outrage. I hope that the Subcommittee on Constitutional Accusations, which chairs Fujimorismo, will not protect Mr. Becerril and will not realize that citizenship is mobilized. We will not allow them to work like a mafia. ❧