[ad_1]
Donald Trump is not alone in Washington even though it is the news center. Beyond what holds the headlines in the press or is a trend in the Twitter social network, the mogul president is not the only one making decisions in the US, and there are few Opposition to which to face
its electoral victory in November 2016 several important players have joined the confrontation to the political agenda of the president. Members of US Congressional Donors, Civil Rights Organizations, and Local Governments Condemned Trump's Manner of Politics for Other Countries and Implications for Americans
. General Motors (GM) warned that if the president continues his wave of tariffs the measure could be counterproductive because it will generate "fewer investments, fewer jobs and less wages "for its workers. The auto giant said the threat of imposing tariffs on car and parts imports could raise vehicle prices and affect Americans. The most affected cars, said GM in a note sent to the Ministry of Commerce, will be those bought by consumers with fewer resources; According to the president's speech, his intention is to "protect" businesses and workers, by targeting dozens of nations with tariffs on metals, and by applying them to broader charges. Chinese products. This policy, which could trigger a trade war, has attracted the reaction of several business sectors in the United States, especially companies that rely on foreign markets for production and sales.
The reality is that the Trump government began applying 25% tax to a long list of Chinese products. It has also imposed tariffs on steel and aluminum imported from the European Union, Canada and Mexico.
"It's hard to see how we're going to do things right," he said. Douglas Irwin, expert in United States trade policies. "It is unprecedented to have persecuted so many allies and business partners, forcing them to fight back," he said.
For its part, the Business Roundtable – group of executive directors of leading companies – issued a strong statement: The Administration that eliminates duty exemptions on steel and aluminum for US allies aggravates a self-inflicted injury in our economy and unnecessarily exposes US exporters to foreign retaliation. "Meanwhile, the Chamber of Commerce has pointed out that 2.6 million jobs are likely to be lost due to Trump's trade policies."
The Capitol also raised its voice. Republican for Tennessee), chairman of the Senate External Relations Committee, accused the president of "abuse of power" and introduced a bipartisan bill that would give Congress the authority to control the president's trade movements. The bill would require congressional approval when the president would pbad tariffs under the pretext of protecting "national security," as did Trump
Senator Lamar Alexander (Republican of Tennessee), chairman of the Health, Education and Labor Commission Pensions warned that tariffs would raise prices and destroy jobs in the manufacturing sector, particularly in the automotive sector, It accounts for one-third of all manufacturing jobs in Tennessee.
Meanwhile, Senator Ben Sbade (Republican by Nebraska) described the measure as "stupid". "Europe, Canada and Mexico are not China, and the allies are not treated in the same way that opponents are treated," he said. Protectionism is one of the causes for which the United States experienced a great depression. "Make America Great Again" should not mean "Make America 1929 Again", he said in reference to one of Trump's favorite slogans .
On the Democrats' side, there were also convictions. Senator Patrick Leahy (Democrat for Vermont) issued a written statement saying that "the reckless actions of the President once again demonstrate that he has no real idea on how to increase jobs manufacturers in the United States. " According to him, Trump acts "without any plan" to solve the problems of American workers. "Canada is Vermont's most important trading partner.These actions are not a pathway to fair trade, they are a route to a failed trade."
Many of Trump's decisions have generated rejection of the trade. key actors in Washington: the policy of "zero tolerance" with what separated immigrant children from their parents, the withdrawal of the UN Human Rights Council and the G7 meeting, to cite some recent examples what a chaotic foreign policy would look like
. chaos? Why make decisions that affect important economic sectors? Most experts agree that the relative loss of power of United States is consolidating, in an increasingly multipolar world. Although they are still the world's leading power, they are now forced to negotiate with others. China, for example, reacted to Trump's tariff policy with similar measures against US products, particularly agricultural products.
Will the United States agree to not always have the dominant voice in the chorus of nations? It would seem that some of the power elites in this country want to adapt to the new context, while others struggle to maintain their supremacy even at the cost of commercial or military wars. The way they answer this question – based on the interaction between different actors – will depend not only on the legacy of Trump's presidency but also on the future of international relations.
Source link
