[ad_1]
On Sunday, the Daily Beast suffered a heavy reaction on social media after one of its reporters was accused of hurting a private citizen who allegedly created a manipulated video that falsely portrayed the House speaker. Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif. as if she were intoxicated and posted on Facebook.
The Daily Beast reporter, Kevin Poulsen, tweeted Saturday night that he "was looking for the Russian troll behind the virile video hoax" Drunk Pelosi "social networks for years, not in Russian." The tweet included a link to a story that identified the man by his name and described his employment history, his past relationships and his imprint on social networks. The subtitle of the story describes this man as "a Bronx sports blogger [who is] currently on probation for domestic battery. "
The article initially included a photo of the man, but this one had been removed from the story as of Sunday night.
The three-minute clip of a May 22 speech by Pelosi at the Center for American Progress, a liberal think tank, was uploaded to Facebook by a group called "WatchDog Politics." The video shows her often confusing her words and her voice sounding confused. Copies of the clip had also been found on Twitter and YouTube, which he had removed.
FIGNORES ACEBOOK HILLARY CLINTON, NANCY PELOSI ON THE RETURN OF DOCTORED VIDEO
The man admitted to the Daily Beast that he was a director of the "Politics WatchDog" group, but denied having published the video of Pelosi, accusing an "administrator".
The report of the Daily Beast has provoked sharp criticism from journalists for sales outlets with variable editorial orientations. Yashar Ali, contributor to Huffington Post and New York, tweeted: "[I]This creates a very bad precedent when a private citizen, especially a person in a blue-collar job, sees his or her identity revealed publicly simply because he made a video of a seemingly drunk politician. His identity offers nothing to this story. "
THE PELOSI IS FACING THE INCOMPACEMENT OF THE CONVENTION OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY OF CALIFORNIA
Jon Levine, editor of Wrap, describes the story as "[a] a job on a completely private citizen … after a video of Pelote on a joke that became viral. "
Charlie Gasparino of Fox Business Network tweeted: "The @thedailybeast Spends a lot of time telling us everything we do not need to know about the guy behind the dopey Pelosi video, which is so far from the real story of our shoot-first movie, the facts later, the social media culture (see more). "
FLASHBACK: #CNNBLACKMAIL: OUTRAGE AFTER NETWORK RESERVE TO THREAT THE REDDIT USER
Former contributor to FoxNews.com, Stephen Miller, is poked fun at Poulsen's tweet about "the search for the Russian troll" behind the Pelosi video.
"[L]iterally, no one thought that [Russians created the Pelosi video], "Tweeted Miller." Media who use their rules to intimidate private citizens for Internet videos they do not like are literally the enemy of the people. "
The Washington examiner indicated that the man was now considering taking legal action.
"I am looking at my options for possible legal action against anyone associated with the publication of this erroneous article about me, quoting me badly and accusing me of being the creator of President Pelosi's video gone viral. "said the man's description of a" lawsuit "he created on GoFundMe.
Facebook's refusal to remove the video sparked an uproar among renowned Democrats. Hillary Clinton called it "sexist foolishness" during a speech delivered in front of Hunter College in New York last week. Pelosi told San Francisco that she no longer gave the benefit of the doubt to Facebook, according to which she would "unknowingly" disseminate false information. She added that Facebook served as an accomplice and facilitator of false information and interference in the elections in Russia.
Monika Bickert, head of product policy and counter-terrorism at Facebook, told users that the video was fake when they viewed it or shared it.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
Facebook does not forbid sharing false information about its service. Instead, the company said it "downgraded" this type of material to make it less visible in news feeds and harder to find. It also uses external auditors to determine the veracity of questionable documents. It includes such fact checks around disputed articles and videos but does not directly qualify them as false.
[ad_2]
Source link