[ad_1]
The resolution extends the political and legal dispute around Trump's campaign promise to build a wall on the US-Mexico border. In several recent lawsuits, including one filed by 16 US states, groups have challenged the president 's emergency declaration. Critics have questioned not only the authority of the president to take the plunge, but also whether migration across the border was really a national emergency.
"All members take an oath to support and defend the Constitution," wrote this week to his colleagues Pelosi. "The President's decision to go beyond the bounds of the law in an attempt to obtain what he has failed to achieve in the constitutional legislative process is a violation of the Constitution and must be overturned. "
Opponents of the emergency statement partly emphasized Trump's comments last week, when he had stated that he "did not need to" take action, but preferred get money for the wall "a lot faster".
Last week, Trump signed a spending bill to keep the government in place until September 30 and to allocate $ 1.375 billion to build border gates. Trump had claimed $ 5.7 billion for a wall – a demand that led to a 35-day record-breaking government shutdown in December and January.
Stymied by Congress, Trump wants to use executive power to build the proposed wall. Trump plans to allocate $ 8 billion in total to the obstacles. The sum includes the funds allocated by the Congress, as well as the funds that it plans to divert from other departments through an executive action.
He would not only use the emergency declaration. Trump plans to take separate action to allocate $ 2.5 billion from the Department of Defense Drug Rehab Program and $ 600 million from the Treasury's Drug Forfeiture Fund.
Through the emergency declaration, the president wants to divert $ 3.6 billion of funds from the Pentagon military construction to the wall.
Many Republicans have expressed concern about the executive action of the president. In particular, they warned that this would create a dangerous precedent for democratic presidents in the future.
Nevertheless, expressing your concerns and voting to block the measure are two different things.
"The national emergency for me is not the solution to favor," said Tuesday at CNBC Senator Rob Portman, R-Ohio, without specifying whether he would support the House's resolution.
Subscribe to CNBC on YouTube.
[ad_2]
Source link