[ad_1]
Placing pokemon in the real world opens a tin can that can not be closed.
The true mystery of "Inspector Pikachu" is never discussed, as it raises such an existential question that a movie in which Ryan Reynolds embodies a beloved video game character would never dare : if pokemon was real, would not he call animals?
In other words, what really distinguishes the charmanders and giclées of the world of chimpanzees and salamanders? Since each pokemon is a distinct species, there must be something that deserves to be defined with a single generic term that excludes the existing animal kingdom. One of the reasons this question is important is that, without answering it, you probably can not explain the fundamental difference between pokemon fighting and dog fighting.
A number of theories emerge by reflecting on this enigma. A common idea among gamers who wish to appease their guilt is that the pokemon-coach relationship is similar to boxer-coach dynamics: Pokemon are forced to fight – that's just what they do – and need to someone to guide them throughout this possible process.
Yet, you do not see too many cubones and torches strolling in the wild, and if they loved so much fighting, you might not need a pokéball to catch them and start their life of pugilistic servitude .
Pokémon do not die in their battles of course, they simply faint. But what really happens when a squirt faints after being beaten by a player? Is he a football player suffering a concussion and are there any protocols to ensure that he does not fight again for a certain number of days, just like the starting pitchers? are given rest days between two departures? How is an adorable poliwirl medically cleansed and what happens when a drowzee suffers so many defeats that his coach decides not to fight him anymore? If a rapidash breaks his leg while using a flare against a kabutops, does he encounter the same fate as a falling horse while training in Santa Anita Park?
Another difference, however slight, is that Pokemon do not meow and do not bark; they say rather their own names. As this movie shows, they can also talk to each other in a way that they can understand, but that humans can not. Do they express reluctance to fight, can not help marveling, or are their spirits so poisoned against each other that they exchange words of battle?
With a "fresh" note of 64% on rotten tomatoes and a metascore of 52, "Detective Pikachu" is the most commented video game movie to date. It's not really a feat, but it's part of a positive trend: "Rampage" and "Tomb Raider", the last two game adaptations, each holding this honor before being overtaken. And yet, he is almost a victim of his own success, at least among those who like to think too much of an idiotic entertainment: if the film did not integrate pokemon so transparently, none of these questions would have been asked at first. square.
It may not be important. The "detective Pikachu" will win a nice penny at the box office this weekend and beyond, with the aim of discovering that the mystery of the filiation of his hero has been resolved. But those of us for whom that is not enough – those of us who best embody the spirit of Detective Pikachu himself – will know that the real mystery has not been solved … for the moment.
S & # 39; register: Stay on top of the latest news from film and television! Sign up for our electronic newsletters here.
[ad_2]
Source link