[ad_1]
The Justice Department argued on Friday that a federal court should reject attempts by the House Democrats to acquire information about the grand jury and the testimony of the investigation of the former Special advocate Robert Mueller because the legislator can not agree on the extent of the need for information.
The DOJ underscored the conflicting comments made by House Democrats about the House Judiciary Committee's investigation into the obstruction of justice and the question of whether it is there. was qualified for an imputation investigation. DOJ officials also noted the House leaders' refusal to dismiss the case as a dismissal investigation.
"The Speaker of the House insisted that the investigation was not a proper indictment procedure," wrote the GM.
The Justice Department said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said the Democrats were "not even close" to opening a formal impeachment investigation.
The DOJ filing also highlighted remarks this month by House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer that the Judiciary Committee is seeking to accelerate court proceedings by persuading the federal courts to convince the court to try to prosecute the case. administration to provide documents and testimonials.
House Democrats tried to receive access to grand jury documents that were acquired during the Mueller investigation. The judicial training asserted that the investigation constituted an "imputation investigation" and that it was following the preliminary stages of a "judicial proceeding". The House Democrats insist that this action is an exception to the federal grand jury secrecy rule.
The Justice Department refuted this assertion on Friday and quoted contradictory comments by Democrats in the House, including confessions, that the judicial commission's investigation could lead to more results than dismissal.
"As the Chairman of the Committee has pointed out – and as the Speaker of the House and the majority leader in the House have reiterated this week – the purpose of his investigation is clear. evaluate many possible remedies, including censorship, impeachment articles, laws, constitutional amendments, and more, "said the Department of Justice. "What can come from this investigation – if it is so – remains unknown and unpredictable."
The Department of Justice went on to argue that although the House's inquiry constituted a preliminary inquiry into removal, the federal grand jury secrecy rules must still be respected.
"[I]A referral procedure to Congress, including a hypothetical referral procedure to the Senate, does not constitute a "judicial process" in the ordinary sense of the term, "said the Department of Justice.
[ad_2]
Source link