[ad_1]
Carlos Freile
A curious reader asks me if I write for a minority because he considers that in my articles I do not usually deal with hot topics, topicality or interest mbadive; before, on the contrary, I write on subjects that are perhaps important, "transcendental", he calls them, adapted to readers with concerns different from those of the Ecuadorian population in general.
In fact, I do not worry if my articles have a wide resonance among readers, if they are few or many, rather than I have been interested in the problems forgotten, or almost, by the journalism national. I proposed to draw attention to what does not attract attention in our environment, both locally and internationally. Not only commenting on news, but reflecting on topics of vital interest, may not be shocking, but basic for people wanting to not get swept away by the whirlwind of events, news, scandals , trifles, many of which are day flowers. they badail us minute after minute. For this reason, I do not disdain to occupy myself with politics, but I try not to stay in the daily life of it, but to deepen its theoretical bases, the values that must impregnate it. I bring to light distant events, but worthy of being known and badyzed by Ecuadorians of good will, eager to go beyond our corruption, our caciquism, our intransigence.
Also, by a first professional deformation historical events, especially those who, IMHO, have been publicly distorted (today, for example, I have been tempted to write about the lie of the Inti Raymi coming to celebrate the Inca age or on the declarations of Cultural Heritage at events that are not 50 years old.]
I have a second professional deformity: I've been a teacher all my life, so I tend to give lessons and I can offend with some teaching tone.I dare to give advice and take Perhaps it's why a minority reads to me.What am I going to do?
[email protected]
Source link
