[ad_1]
The beginning of the VAR left doubts and blows
The video arbitration (VAR, for its acronym in English) was released at the World Cup in Russia. FIFA President Gianni Infantino has defended its use. "He has not changed football, he's doing it cleaner, more honest, more transparent and fairer," he said.
Spanish goalkeeper Iker Casillas, world champion in 2010, confessed to not understand very well the use of VAR. "Because, according to him, the Argentine referee Néstor Pitana said" a foul that is not to (Antoine) Griezmann "on the game of the first goal of France against Croatia (4-2)
Uruguayan striker Luis Suarez He gave the reason and remarked that "apart from that (Paul) Pogba is offside, he" participates "in the play …".
Believing the opposite
Croatian coach Zlatko Dalic said the VAR is good for football, although video refereeing can be decisive in defeating his team in the final of the World Cup. "I think in a World Cup final, you do not have to whistle a penalty like that, but never comment on the arbitrations, respect the referees," said Dalic, adding that "the VAR is good for football. "
He liked it here
" In some situations, he defined games, but others may have liked not be the fact that the game is interrupted to review games, c & # 39; is to say by a human hand. For me, it was something innovative and very useful, I do not think the emotion of football was lost, "said former referee Jorge Mora Linda [19659003LuisMuentesdirectoroftheEquatorialArbitrationAssociationmoreimportantthingshappenedinthisWorldCup"DespitehavingseenaspectaculartournamentaccordingtomycriteriaIwasdelightedthatthereistalkofalesserproportionofrefereeingandthatmeansthattheVARwasveryuseful"hesaid
He added: "I think it was done justice with the referees of the World, because they always ended up judging them, since there was no possibility to go into review of isolated movements, difficult to visualize ". (SJMS Agencies)
Source link
