[ad_1]
Danilo Arbilla
Montevideo, Uruguay
Alan García Pérez, twice President of Peru (1985-1990 and 2006-2011) and senator for life, took advantage of the weekend. Last Saturday (17), he went to the Uruguayan Embbady in Lima, where he opened the doors and has asylum. He says that he is a political persecuted.
The persecutor is the Peruvian justice who investigates him for more than one case of corruption during his presidency and after. However, without making a first statement on his part, he arranged in advance to close the borders, while García had arrived from Spain. your own will
The person who paid the alleged bribes was the Brazilian multinational Odebrecht. That the other?
A first fact: there is no more dangerous work in Peru than that of President of the Republic. Alejandro Toledo is "fugitive" in the United States required by justice, Ollanta Humala and his wife Nadine Heredia they were imprisoned shortly after leaving the presidency, Pedro Pablo Kuczynsky He had to resign from the presidency. Even to those who walk nearby: Keiko Fujimori, the candidate with the most favorable votes, was also investigated and jailed for some time. In all cases of alleged payment -coimas- Odebrecht.
Second data: Odebrecht was the biggest predator of corruption. He devastated the continent and especially during the presidency of Lula. Many of the lawsuits against Lula are directly related to Odebrecht. Lula was a kind of "director" of Odebrecht, his lectures were the best salary and his "Institute" the spoiled child.
Third data Garcia always has an badet: he does not escape, he does not wait for him to be imprisoned or presented: he chooses the alternative of "political prisoner" and that the governments of Peru and Uruguay are set. We are already talking about tension, which is not yet the case.
It is notorious that Garcia had a friend in Uruguay who opened the door of the embbady, but from there, the Uruguayan government must decide whether to badign the status of political prisoner who is the subject of an investigation by the justice for crimes of common right, in a recognized Democratic country with total independence and autonomy of its three powers.
Uruguay, which is going to take its time, has a wide margin of law based on international conventions, where we consider in a certain way that of the doubt in favor of the international community. 39; accused. But Peru has already sent many documents explaining why nothing to do with a political prisoner. There is even a letter from the former president and prisoner Humala and a visit from Peruvian parliamentarians is announced. The pressure is great. They want Garcia to be in jail.
Uruguay, a country with a long and flawless tradition of political asylum, has no easy task. His current government also showed that he was not managing foreign affairs very well.
The theme has its edges. There is no doubt that in Peru there is democracy and independence of powers. The question is what happens within these powers and whether they are reliable: the current president was not elected, investigations are ongoing and even prisoners in Congress, and very recently justice and Judges were involved in a big scandal. ugly It should be added that if some candidates for the candidacy of Sergio Moro did not show up, the Brazilian judge referred to the minister.
Garcia is not a political prisoner, but they had it between the eyes. The most proven imputation concerns the payment of a conference (100,000 USD), with funds provided indirectly by Odebrecht. In fact, if you begin to imprison all those who have received conferences for which Odebrecht could have paid, it is not difficult for us to miss "fathers of the motherland" throughout the continent: South, Central and North. There was even a price catalog: led by Lula, the most expensive.
And they "wrapped up" – Moro's syndrome – and decreed the closing of borders without wondering how that was. A kind of prejudice. And Garcia, neither short nor lazy, is hooked on that.
I do not know if he will be involved or not. It seems that all or almost all have succumbed to temptation. But the most relevant and disturbing fact of all of this is that who decides who is corrupt, who says who has been corrupted and who has accepted money, is the people of Odebrecht. In the same way, the greatest criminals who came out of the money to corrupt and rot all the hemisphere and for those who, unfortunately, did not act badly; it is they who, while negotiating their sorrows, say yes and that is not the case.
Like everything feels really bad.
Source link
