Quo vadis, Donald Trump? – The EC Republic



[ad_1]


Carlos Alberto Montaner
Miami, United States

Donald Trump has the pathological need to obey him. This usually happens to alpha males. In Germany, he criticized Angela Merkel because she was in agreement with Russia to create a direct gas pipeline while the United States is protecting the country from a war with Moscow. He did not understand Merkel's reasons. The Russian energy supply was also a shield against the war. What sense did it have for Moscow to liquidate its first source of foreign exchange earnings or to fight with it?

In the United Kingdom, Trump scolded Theresa May, the Conservative Prime Minister. He blamed him for ignoring his advice on how to handle Brexit and threatened to bury the promised preferential trade agreement with the United States. By the way, he recommended former Minister Boris Johnson, a tough, as prime minister. We already know that Trump lacks sympathy for the European Union. If it was for him, he would dissolve this organism immediately. When, surprisingly, the United Kingdom voted to part with the agency, he celebrated it by inviting Nigel Farage to the White House, the biggest Brexit advocate in his country.

Trump is also not comfortable with NATO. He asked member countries of the institution to contribute 4% of GDP to the defense. Double the previously agreed. This percentage is higher than the percentage the United States devotes to this element (3.5%). With this exaction, it will destroy NATO. That's what he wants. He will use the violation as an alibi to go out. Trump, of course, is preparing the conditions for packing. He will abandon NATO as he did with the Trans-Pacific Partnership Treaty and perhaps with the Free Trade Agreement with Mexico and Canada.

On his trip to Europe, he used a Nazi argument to disqualify immigration. He did not oppose it because it was illegal, but because it distorted the European identity. It was the pretext of Hitler to murder millions of Jews and tens of thousands of Gypsies. They have distorted the Christian and white essence of Germany. While Trump fired his racist missiles, the French parliament approved a contrary measure: he eliminated the race from the description of his natives. And that's fine: just contemplate the France team at the World Football Championship. He is full of Afro-French.

But there is more: a lot of experts think that an unusual and rude behavior in a president has an electoral background. This is the case of Ana Navarro, badyst and Republican strategist, which does not prevent it from opposing Trump, and Eduardo Gamarra, political scientist, professor at Florida International University: Trump talks to his American fans. It's in the countryside. In a recent survey in Florida, 38% of respondents said that Hispanic immigrants had not been positive for the state, only 28% said the opposite. The rest, until reaching 100%, could not issue an opinion.

On the other hand, Trump is absolutely in keeping with his campaign promises and his beliefs. For a nationalist opposed to globalization, NATO, the EU, free trade agreements and free trade do not make sense. Feel that allies are exploiting the United States. It seems to him that his nation does not have to defend rich countries like Germany or England. He hates the foreign aid that the country gives. And it's not just in this position. A large percentage of American society believes the same thing. Until the eve of the Pearl Harbor attack, the majority of the population preferred to be neutral and not to participate in the horrendous slaughterhouse of World War II. Even millions of Americans sympathized with Germany.

Franklin D. Roosevelt managed to impose a different point of view. The United States could not continue to protect itself from conflict by isolation. That was what George Washington had recommended to his compatriots in his farewell speech. The honest George was wrong. He spoke in the late eighteenth century to a community of four million Americans who did not dream of the existence of aviation. This attitude had not been used at Woodrow Wilson during the First World War. By fire and fire, German submarines dragged the United States into the 14th war, but Roosevelt did not serve it either, as he discovered on December 7, 1941, when the Japanese sprayed a naval base in Hawaii [19659009]. this point where the United States, faced with the inability to ignore the rest of the international players, decided to lead the country's natural allies. It is then that the notion of Free World arises (sometimes inaccurate). The idea was to create defensive pacts that would serve to contain enemies. The starting point was to avoid the financial disaster of nations, because it was one of the germs of wars. Before the Cold War, the Breton Woods Conference was the first step. There, the foundations of the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund and the dollar have been established as the world currency.

From 1945, the Cold War began. Harry Truman was already in the chair and he continued Roosevelt's strategy. The United States coordinated military and diplomatic defense with NATO, the Marshall Plan, the OAS, the UN, the TIAR and the rest of the combat instruments. It cost the country a lot of money, but it would have cost a lot more for another world war. Today, this device costs 3.5% of GDP. During the Second World War it cost 50%. It was not a question of kindness, nor even of idealistic commitment to freedom. The ultimate goal was to avoid another planetary devastation that would inevitably affect the United States.

Truman and eleven other Presidents, Republicans and Democrats, maintained Roosevelt's reasoning. Donald Trump is the one who broke this strategy. Probably in a few years we will see the terrible consequences of his policy.

[ad_2]
Source link