The hour of news from Ecuador, its provinces and the world



[ad_1]

Manuel Castro M.

When they played Correa, they danced. Although at the beginning of his political performance Correa was proclaimed antidolarizador, anti-imperialist, who made fun of the democratic system, a large majority of politicians and intellectuals regarded him as a young, "progressive" politician, and the people of the novelero were stunned because it offered happiness, a better world and a distribution of state property that would put an end to inequality and poverty.

It was not that they were not reasoning, but that they were closing their eyes to see if they were "managing" them as they did to the previous rulers . Even the millionaire Álvaro Noboa, with all his political and ideological insignificance, contributed, as a candidate, with his money, to become a kind of funny chemo.
Today, they tear their clothes and are "afraid" of what has happened the last ten years: corruption, waste, inefficiency, a country on the brink of economic, moral and social collapse. He forgot that democracy is the responsibility of an entire society. In the beginning, Correa's good intentions were mentioned, and after a few months he pbaded $ 180,000 in his favor to $ 600,000, thanks to the judges submitted. He did not need to go to court then, as he would do later in his total form.

Under the leadership of the executive, the workers were not hesitant to create a government-dependent organization. The same teachers submitted to an entity created by Correa. The sentences were sent prefabricated by the "chuckys seven". Diplomatic bags with drugs were sent. Patiño made clandestine recordings. However, Correa was re-elected. Together with Chavez, Maduro, Ortega, Evo, they decided to stay in power. The high military domes were silent. Silence reigned, with timid badertions, especially from the so-called "corrupt" press.

The essential point is that a blind majority allows and allows the course of democracy to be reoriented towards the so-called socialism of the twenty-first century. a new system where democracy has the state and not the people. Fanatic skills and ideas remained.

[email protected]

[ad_2]
Source link