[ad_1]
Alejandro Tagliavini
Because of the inhuman and cruel "war on drugs", few people have been imprisoned since Nixon and only 40 million in Mexico, since 2006, more than 80,000 deaths. This is the consequence of the crackdown by establishing a ban that seems to be only a matter of politicians and bureaucrats.
How is it explained that in the United States, the country with the best equipped security forces in the world is the Consumers exist, that is, where there is more traffic? Are these forces so ineffective or is there collusion between traffickers, politicians and the police?
Is it permissible to use violence to prevent someone from committing suicide? The theory of least evil is not lawful as John Paul II makes clear in his encyclical "Veritatis Splendor". And, by the way, are they so harmful drugs? Without a doubt, but curiously, others that are "legal" cause more damage. Another argument is that it would be the right to self-defense since drug addicts would be dangerous people for society.
In the first place, it is not clear that they are inherently dangerous, they seem rather physically and mentally handicapped; On the other hand, it is credible that, once criminalized by the state, they become criminals because of the impossibility of calming their dependence by normal means and at non-monopoly prices [19659003ThedilemmaisthemonopolyofcivilservantsorthenaturalregulationofthemarketContrarytowhathappensinrepressivecountriesinPortugalwheredrugsarefreerthenumberofcrimesanddrugaddictsislower
According to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, in Portugal, there is 0.5 homicide per 100,000 population, whereas in the United States, there is 0, 5 homicide per 100,000 population per year. are 4.7
* Member of the Center on Global Prosperity, Oakland, California. @alextagliavini
Source link
