[ad_1]
Tariq Samir:
The decision of the Supreme Council of the Media to suspend the publication of all matters relating to investigations conducted by the Judicial Committee in the work of the Children's Cancer Hospital known as Media 57357 raises questions about the extent of its legality. The "Supreme Media" decision in its press release on Wednesday called for all parties to stop writing on the subject (regarding 57357 hospital) and to cease broadcasting audio and video programs that are not available. it addresses until the ministerial committee finishes its investigations. What you are currently conducting, and to announce their results,
Dr. Shawqi al-Sayyid, constitutional jurist, believes that "Higher Media" has the right to sign the ban on publishing to any media or media organization , in violation of the rules and standards "The decisions of the board must not be absolute, they must have clear reasons and reasons."
In statements to Masrawi, al-Sayyid adds that if the publication ban was issued, uncensored case "57357" The procedure is illegal, and if it has precedents for the investigation and monitoring violations in the process
Dr. Salah al-Tahawi, a member of the Supreme Committee for Law Reform, described the decision as "more preventive than therapeutic."
"As he said, pointing out that the publication ban in the case is legally correct, and is not contrary to the freedom of publication provided for in the Constitution, All the more so as the Board is charged with investigating these issues.Through the visual and audio media and print media, it may happen the other way around, Phil
L & # 39; Article 26 of the Law on the Supreme Council of the Media provides that "Without prejudice to the competence of the Public Prosecutor, the Supreme Council, of the office or on complaint, The Committee establishes a list of sanctions and measures that can be signed by press institutions, national press institutions, media institutions, public media institutions and media. However, Ahmed Abdel Rahman, a former member of the Supreme Judicial Council, emphasized in his statements to Masrawi that the Attorney General is exclusively competent to prohibit the publication of cases, "In the case of 57357 Hospital, it has the the right to submit an application for a publication ban for the Attorney General to so decide.) Who verifies the work of the hospital are entitled to apply in this way "
Hatem Zakaria, Member of the Supreme Council for Media Regulation, agreed with Abdel Rahman on the fact that the prosecutor had the power to prohibit the publication of the case, adding that the council had made the decision to keep the secret.
Zakaria responded to the council's sanctions against busterists, explaining that they vary from fines to permanent and temporary suspension. Sometimes over 250,000 pounds.
She was a doctor The Minister of Social Solidarity, Ghada Wali, decided on June 26 to create an expanded committee to review the work of the 57357 Foundation for Childhood Cancer, after the controversy over how the organization works. 39 hospital and the way donations are made. ) {
var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName (s) [0];
if (d.getElementById (id)) returns;
js = d.createElement (s); js.id = id;
js.src = "http://connect.facebook.net/ar_AR/all.js#xfbml=1&appId=127325914013601";
fjs.parentNode.insertBefore (js, fjs);
} (document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));
[ad_2]
Source link
