Elizabeth Warren criticizes Judge Alito for ‘overtly partisan’ speech

by



[ad_1]

His. Elizabeth warrenElizabeth Warren The Hill Campaign Report: GOP Senators Say Biden Deserves Briefings Intel Biden Speaks With Democratic Leaders About COVID (D-Mass.) Sentenced the Supreme Court judge on Friday Samuel alitoSamuel Alito Will the Supreme Court remove ObamaCare from life support? Trump’s lawsuits are good for America’s democracy ObamaCare and the saddest type of dissent READ MORE during a speech he gave Thursday at the Federalist Society’s annual meeting, which Warren called an “overtly partisan” speech.

“Supreme Court justices aren’t meant to be political hacks,” former Democratic 2020 presidential candidate written on twitter. “This right-wing speech is clearly partisan.

“My bill to #EndCorruptionNow restores a certain integrity to our Court by forcing judges to follow the ethical rules followed by other federal judges, ”added Warren, referring to his proposal Law on the fight against corruption and public integrity aimed at preventing corruption in politics and political partisanship in the justice system.

In Alito’s Thursday remarks given by video, justice affirmed that the coronavirus pandemic caused restrictions on freedom “previously unimaginable”, according to Reuters.

Alito specifically highlighted the effect of the restrictions on religious events, such as Easter Sunday and Yom Kippur.

Rhode Island Sen. Sheldon whitehouseSheldon Whitehouse Democrats warn GOP will regret Barrett’s confirmation GOP Senate confirms Trump’s Supreme Court choice to succeed Ginsburg senators’ battle against Supreme Court candidate in rare Saturday session MORE (D) also targeted Alito, tweet Friday morning that justice was a “full partisan crusader”.

It is generally considered the norm for Supreme Court justices and federal judges to refrain from commenting on politically partisan matters, with many believing that legal professionals have a responsibility to be fair judges of the law, rather only political lawyers.

LGBT rights groups also criticized Alito after he said in Thursday’s remarks: “We cannot say that marriage is a union between a man and a woman. Until recently, this is what the vast majority of Americans thought. Now that is considered bigotry.

“That this happened after our ruling in Obergefell shouldn’t have come as a surprise,” he added, referring to the landmark 2015 ruling Obergefell v. Hodges, which guaranteed same-sex marriage rights across the country.

On Thursday, Alito cited his dissent in the case, in which he argued that the majority opinion would lead to those who “cling to traditional views on marriage” to be “labeled as fanatics and treated as such. by governments, employers and schools ”.

In response, Aphonso David, President of the Human Rights Campaign, argued on Twitter that Alito “reject any claim of impartiality in a politically charged discourse, again attacking the Obergefell decision.

“Justice Alito: Our love and our marriages are valid,” David added. “There is no tension between full equality and religious freedom.”



[ad_2]

Source link