[ad_1]
Elizabeth Warren the disastrous DNA report and the accompanying announcement video were removed from his campaign website, a move that only shrinks the Massachusetts senator's long-standing claim to Cherokee Indian heritage.
Until this weekend, the Senator's website included a 2018 DNA test showing that she is between 1 / 64th and 1 / 1024th Amerindian. Warren's website also included a video extolling the report's findings, saying it justified his decision, as a law professor, to claim Cherokee's Indian heritage for legal and professional purposes. All this has been judiciously removed, according to the Daily Caller, now that Warren is the real contender in second place.
Warren also apologized rudely to Native American leaders this week, telling them that she had made "mistakes" in dealing with her ancestral claims.
"I know I've made mistakes, I'm sorry for the wrongs that I've caused," the senator said Monday at the Native American Issues Forum. "I've listened and learned a lot, and I'm grateful for the many conversations we've had together – it's a great honor to collaborate with the Indian country."
One question that remains to be answered is that now that Warren has withdrawn the so-called proof of her supposed Native heritage, where are the newsrooms that initially announced that her DNA cascade "justified" her ancestral claims? Will newsrooms do the same and remove their first inaccurate and embarrassing reports immediately?
the Boston Globe's The first title in the subject reads: "Warren reveals a test confirming ancestry". His report, which was the first of many, was published twice. corrected later due to the weak understanding of its author in basic mathematics. The errors corrected since originally claim that Warren's claims on the Native American heritage were stronger than the DNA report shows.
As a reminder, Boston Globe is the same newsroom that published a major correction in 2012 after claiming, without proof, that Warren's great-great-great-great-grandmother was Native American. The correction reads as follows:
Due to a report error, an article in the May 1 Metro section and the accompanying title incorrectly described the 1894 document purporting to list Elizabeth Warren's great-great-great-grandmother as a Cherokee.
The document, referred to in a newsletter for the family found by the New England Historic Genealogical Society, was a marriage license application and not the license itself. Neither the company nor the Globe has seen the main document, the existence of which has not been proven.
With regard initially to the DNA test as a victory for Warren, the Boston Globe is far from being alone.
The Huffington Post published two videos, the first titled "After Trump's Years of Trump, Warren Proves Native American Descent" and the second entitled "The Evidence of Warren's Native Ancestry".
"Elizabeth Warren fights Trump's provocation 'Pocahontas' with a DNA test proving Native American roots," reads a Daily Beast headline, and published a second title titled "Elizabeth Warren publishes her DNA test: yes, she is Native American ".
The intercept included: "Elizabeth Warren reveals DNA evidence of Native American ancestry, responding to Trump's taunts".
"An analysis of DNA carried out on Senator Elizabeth Warren clearly shows that she has a Native American heritage, an assertion that her critics have long mocked," the Associated Press reported on social media.
According to Politico, "Elizabeth Warren knocks on Trump and publishes a DNA test" strongly "in favor of Native American ancestry."
To be fair, some publications have cited the words "solid evidence" in their titles directly in the report, though skepticism may be insufficient. This includes CNN ("Elizabeth Warren publishes a DNA test with" strong evidence "of Native American ancestry") and the Washington Examiner ("Elizabeth Warren's DNA test shows" strong evidence "of the blood of Native Americans").
And several of these newsrooms later published reports and follow-up comments, noting that Warren's DNA test revealed the opposite of what she claimed to have.
Having said that, what should we do with their initial reports now that the honorable senator has reneged on his own "evidence"? That is, now that the senator's own campaign team withdrew the test and the announcement video that comes with its 2020 website, journalists may also need to consider removing stories. who initially claimed that the waterfall "justified" Warren.
[ad_2]
Source link