[ad_1]
It is difficult to please everyone with a debt cancellation plan when some people choose lower-cost colleges, incur little or no debt, or have made other sacrifices to repay their loans.
But Warren's plan would offer debt relief based on income. Households earning less than $ 100,000 per year would get $ 50,000 in loan cancellation, with the amount of relief decreasing as income levels increase, and households earning over $ 250,000 unable to claim debt relief.
Yet some policy experts do not believe that measuring the total dollar amount for low-income students is the right indicator for assessing whether the policy is fair or progressive.
"Regardless of the dollar amount, the existence of a debt is much riskier for low- and middle-income households," said Mark Huelsman, deputy policy director at Liberal think tank Demos.
"I think that there is an interesting debate left now on the point of knowing if progressive, it just depends on where the money goes, in relation to the impact of politics – how inclusive it is for everyone.I do not think there is a right answer, it comes down to value judgments, "added Huelsman.
Many of those who are struggling to repay their debt would probably see it wiped out under Warren's plan. According to the analysis provided by his campaign, 86% of people in the lower two income quintiles would receive a total cancellation of the student loan.
"This is a very progressive proposal.We tax the fortunes of people with more than $ 50 million in wealth to cancel the debt of 42 million low-income Americans and students." middle class, "said a Warren campaign assistant in a statement. provided to CNN.
The problem is that people in high-income households are more likely to go to university and take out larger student loans, said Matthew Chingos, director of the Center's Data and Policy Center. Education at the Urban Institute and one of the authors. of the study.
Chingos and his co-author, Kristin Blagg, also discovered that Warren's plan would achieve one of his goals, which is to reduce the gap in racial wealth. According to their report, 25% of all canceled debt dollars would go to black households, while they only account for 16% of all households that benefit from debt relief.
But a more focused approach to canceling student debt could be cheaper. Warren's campaign estimates that it would cost $ 640 billion to lighten the debt.
The government already offers loan exemption plans to some students. Distressed borrowers can enroll in an income-oriented program that typically cancels the remaining debt of undergraduate students after having repaid it for 20 years or 25 years for higher debt. . Other programs provide respite for people in public sector jobs and those who attended for-profit schools that closed during registration.
If students from better-off households are more likely to go to university, Warren's part of the plan that does not involve tuition could be perceived as sending too much money taxpayers to those who do not need help. This does not exclude students from wealthy families, although it calls for spending an additional $ 100 billion over 10 years on grants for low-income students to help pay for their housing costs , food, books and babysitting.
But the Progressive Change campaign committee supported Warren's plan.
"We urge all Democratic candidates to follow Elizabeth Warren's bold ideas on student debt so that our side can inspire new voters and be even better positioned to defeat Trump by 2020," said co-founder Adam Green .
[ad_2]
Source link