[ad_1]
JM: I totally agree that the problem of the population will face a huge challenge. 1.4 billion people in China, it seems a lot, but I think in the next 20 years we will see that this situation will pose big problems in China and that the population will decrease – the speed of the reduction of the population is going to s & # 39; accelerate. Now, you called it a collapse. I agree with that.
EM: Accelerated collapse. And then the common refutation is like, what about immigration? Like, where?
JM: Yes, you want to go to Mars …
EM: Mars needs people, you know, Mars, people, you know, there's no zero people out there right now. This is the planet machine, there are only a few robots.
JM: That's one thing we should pay special attention to – that's why 18 million newborn babies born in China, which is less than 1% of something, we should spend more time to the creation of these people and to a better life. In our society, the AI calls Alibaba intelligence, because we think that when the order is applied, that logic is used, machines can always do better, l & # 39; AI can do better. But if things are wise or logical, human beings can do better. For example, when you love someone, there is no reason. Normally, I like it or I like it, I have no reason. But when I hate someone, when I want to do bad things, something, there is a logic and when there is logic, the AI can do better. We teach the machines all the bad things that the bad guys want to do. The machines can learn quickly and stop all the bad guys immediately. But when you want to do good things, not necessarily.
EM: AI means love.
JM: This is absolutely true. That's why the whole world: if AI can bring love, which I called in the past, if you have the successful person, you must have QE and IQ, right? In the future, if you want to survive in this world, you must be the LQ – the Q of love, it is important too. Otherwise, can not survive in this deficiency. Talent is the time.
EM: I agree, love is the answer. There are a lot of songs about it.
JM: Do you mean machines, life? Or do you want to talk about your cars, your autonomy? What do you want to talk about?
EM: This sounds like one of those steps in a video game where you have to choose a path. I choose life.
JM: Ok, life. So, how long do you think people can live with the help of AI? Can AI contribute to the sustainability of the environment?
EM: Well, I think first, I think humans will solve the problem of environmental sustainability, I do not want to suggest complacency. Or that we simply take the easy thing. In fact, it is a prophecy that is realized or not realized. We must take immediate and dramatic action. And continue the momentum towards environmental sustainability. And China is actually the world leader in this area. In fact, I do not know how well it is known outside of China, how much China is a world leader in environmental sustainability. It is extremely impressive. I mean, I think half of all electric cars in the world were made in China last year, or something like that. So, you know, so I do not want to suggest complacency. But I think humans can and will solve the problem of sustainability.
If we can, if we can do the Neuralink essentially, age will not matter. You can simply back up your state and restore it. Just like a saved game, basically, something very close to that. I think we can solve biological aging. If we really wanted it, we would have to change the DNA, but we are obviously on a clock, all the organisms are. I mean, you could take a fruit fly, for example. And you could do yoga every day, have a very healthy diet and live for three weeks or even four weeks. So, environmental factors are relatively minor to prolong life, you have to change the DNA. So the question is, will people accept changing DNA? it's what counts to prolong life, you know, and probably, people are a bit reluctant about it. But that's essentially what needs to happen to prolong life. or you have to stop the clock from the DNA one way or the other. I do not know if we should work there or not. I honestly think you know it's probably a good thing that we eventually die. You know, there is a saying in physics, like even physicists, who are usually pretty objective, it's like saying that not all physicists change their minds, they die. So maybe, you know, it's good to have this life cycle.
[ad_2]
Source link