[ad_1]
In a case filed Monday with the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, Facebook said the FTC “has not alleged any plausible factual basis for labeling Facebook as an illegal monopolist,” calling the agency’s claims. of “litigation-based fiction” that ignores the competition from “burgeoning rivals like TikTok”.
The FTC declined to comment.
In the revised complaint, which is about 50% longer than the original, the FTC covered many of the same arguments. The FTC continues to claim that Facebook broke the law by engaging in anti-competitive acquisitions, including Instagram and WhatsApp, and denied third-party applications access to Facebook’s platform in an anti-competitive manner. The updated complaint attempted to respond to the judge’s comment that the FTC failed to provide metrics to back up his arguments by referring to the time users spend on Facebook’s platform compared to others. competitors, as well as the number of daily and monthly users of Facebook services.
In its petition, Facebook alleged that even after having had more time to provide facts to support its case against the company, the FTC “did not fail to do so.”
[ad_2]
Source link