Federal Court of Appeal rules against Trump administration’s public office rule

by



[ad_1]

The rule makes it more difficult for immigrants to obtain legal status if they use public benefits such as Medicaid, food stamps, and housing vouchers. He immediately met with rejection, and was subsequently blocked by the courts, after his release.

In Wednesday’s 2-1 decision, the Ninth Circuit concluded that the rule caused financial harm to states and did not promote self-sufficiency as the administration suggested. The panel also argued that the administration failed to explain the abrupt change in policy.

“Responding to DHS ‘assertion that the overall objective of the law is to promote self-reliance, the committee concluded that access to better health care, better nutrition and additional housing benefits corresponds precisely to this objective, ”wrote Judge Mary M. Schroeder for the majority.

Biden administration gears up to inherit Trump's controversial immigration policies
The “public charge” rule rebounded in courts nationwide, eventually reaching the Supreme Court, allowing its implementation across the country earlier this year.
While this suspension remains in effect, the settlement has since continued to be referred to the federal court of appeal. In August, the Second United States Court of Appeals blocked the rule in three states – Connecticut, New York and Vermont. The motion to suspend the government was subsequently granted, allowing the administration to proceed with the implementation of the rule.

USCIS spokesman Dan Hetlage told CNN in a statement following the ruling that “USCIS is currently reviewing the court order issued by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, and the agency has no further comments to provide at the moment ”.

The Ninth Circuit restricted a national injunction put in place by a lower court, arguing that “the same issues regarding its validity have been and are being litigated in multiple federal district and circuit courts.” It applies to the Ninth Circuit and other jurisdictions involved in cases, including Maine, Oregon, Pennsylvania and the District of Columbia, according to the California Attorney General’s office.

“As we continue to face an unprecedented economic and public health crisis, forcing hard-working families to choose between basic necessities and maintaining their immigration status is inhumane,” the attorney general said of California Xavier Becerra in a statement. “Attacking the health care of one community is an attack on all of us. Today’s victory is essential, but the fight is not over. We will not let the Trump administration’s assault on our immigrant communities go unchecked.

[ad_2]

Source link