[ad_1]
A three-judge panel of the Third Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the request by the Trump campaign, led by Rudy Giuliani, to modify his trial, which had previously been rejected.
“The Campaign never alleges that a ballot was fraudulent or issued by an illegal voter,” the judges wrote. “He never alleges that a defendant treated the Trump campaign or his votes worse than he treated the Biden campaign or his votes. Calling something discriminatory does not make it so. The second amended complaint still suffers. of these fundamental flaws, therefore granting leave to amend would have been futile. “
The president and some of his allies have questioned the legitimacy of the 2020 election, claiming without evidence that it was fraudulent and seeking to use legal battles to overturn the results in key states.
The judges also rejected the president’s motion to rescind Pennsylvania’s certification of votes.
“The Campaign’s claims are baseless. The number of ballots she specifically contests is well below the victory margin of about 81,000 votes. And she never claims that there was fraud or that votes were cast by illegal voters. Plus, throwing out millions of mails – the ballots would be drastic and unprecedented, robbing a large chunk of the electorate and upsetting all downward races. This remedy would be manifestly disproportionate to the procedural challenges raised, “the judges wrote.
Brann likened him to the “randomly assembled Frankenstein monster” and criticized the demand to deprive nearly seven million voters in a complaint littered with “strained unfounded legal arguments and speculative accusations.”
The appeals court referred to the multiple attempts by the Trump campaign to modify his trial and praised Brann’s handling of the case.
“We commend the district court for its prompt, fair and patient handling of this demanding litigation,” the panel wrote.
This story is breaking and will be updated.
[ad_2]
Source link