Federal judge says DOJ can not swap legal team in census case

by



[ad_1]

"The defendants provide no reason, let alone" satisfactory reasons "for the substitution of a board, wrote district judge Jesse Furman, citing upcoming deadlines.

"As this Court observed several months ago, this case was heard in the field – based in large part on" the insistence (own) of the defendants "- that the prompt settlement of plaintiffs' claims is a matter of great public and private importance. "

Furman may also consider the plaintiffs' requests to impose sanctions in the case, as the witnesses of the administration allegedly did not tell the truth and to prevent the administration from changing the law. census.

Requests to change lawyers in civil cases are almost always allowed, making Mardi Furman's decision even more surprising in a case that has already taken several amazing turns.

President Donald Trump embarrassed himself in a new confusion last week by announcing that he would continue his efforts to add a question to the decennial survey on the status of citizen despite the decision of the Supreme Court at the end of June, block the move.

Civil rights groups say that including this measure will frighten legal immigrants as well as undocumented migrants, which will result in inaccurate population counts. The census is used to define voting limits as well as for funding social assistance and other government programs.

The government stated that the issue needed to be resolved by July 1 so that the questionnaires could be printed in time. Officials announced last week that they would proceed, despite Trump's continued efforts to get the issue of citizenship added.

Trump is still considering a decree to force a citizenship issue in the 2020 census, according to officials familiar with the situation.

Attorney General Bill Barr announced Monday that the administration would decide in "the next day or in the next two days" the possibility of conducting the census.

"We looked at all the options," he told reporters in South Carolina, adding that he was "in constant discussions with the president" over the past week.

"Over the next two days, you'll see what approach we take," said Barr. Going with an executive order, he said, "provides a way to get a question about the census".

The Justice Ministry declined to comment on Tuesday.

Trump tweeted earlier on Tuesday about the "forced" decision, saying that she "shows how incredibly important our 2020 election is".

"I have long heard that the appointment of Supreme Court justices was the most important decision of the President – SO REAL!" he tweeted.

The 2020 census poses two other daunting challenges and its inclusion of a citizenship issue in front of other federal judges. One of the business, California, has a hearing scheduled for Wednesday. In the other, in Maryland, plaintiffs are allowed to gather new evidence indicating whether the administration intended to discriminate by adding the question.

This story has been updated.

[ad_2]

Source link