Florida vs Miami, points to remember: 8th place Gators against penalties, turnarounds to beat the Canes



[ad_1]

ORLANDO, Florida – The 2019 season kicked off on Saturday night and the first game of the 150th year of college football between Florida 8th and Miami was as complicated as expected for a game in Week 0. In the end, despite a game filled with numbers and a very penalizing second half, the Gators managed to beat the Canes 24-20 by beating their opponent 17-7 in the second half. It was the second time that UF had beaten its rival since 1986.

Florida led 7-3 at the end of the first quarter largely because they had a 3-on-3 record in the fourth attempt to open the match. (He would finish 4-on-4 on the low end in the game.) However, the Gators escaped twice in the first half, once in the Canes 10, and both were recovered by Miami. As the Canes began with a pair of goals, Redshirt rookie quarterback Jarren Williams reduced UF for a considerable number of passes on a 90-yard touchdown to take the advantage 13-7 unless One minute of the half. This gave Miami the chance to debut updated business number string and new touch rings.

Florida responded to the half with 10 points in a row, including a touchdown following a punt by Miami. The Canes reacted immediately, taking advantage of two disastrous penalties to return to the Gators after a 50-yard touchdown by DeeJay Dallas. Florida was quick to rebound when quarterback Feleipe Franks left a magnificent 65-yard pass to wide receiver Joshua Hammond and finally scored a goal to bring back the UF 24-20.

This score would be valid, but not without a lot of mistakes on both sides. Florida stopped Miami at 4 and 9 with 4:30 of play, but Franks inexplicably launched a terrible interception in the next game, making UM the ball on his 40. The ensuing series was almost inexplicable.

The Canes attack that followed lasted 10 games but only covered 14 meters at the end of the match. How? Miami groped three times on the way but got them all back. While she was not trying to give the ball, Florida was trying to keep it in the hands of her opponent. The Gators inflicted two interference penalties – one in fourth and 34th place, one in third and 12th place – before stopping the Canes for good.

Let's take a look at five points to remember from the Florida-Miami match.

1. Sloppy, sloppy, sloppy: Despite the entertainment – and sometimes nonsense – created by the constant misunderstanding of both teams, the first game of the season on Saturday night was another reminder that week 1 (or in this case week 0) was too early for s & Expect teas to appear in mid-season form. Canes made penalties all night (14 for 125 yards). The Gators kept theirs for the second period (nine for 100 yards in the evening). Florida had four turnovers in the game (two fumbles lost in the first half, two interceptions in the fourth quarter), while Miami spat the ball three times in the last series, but was lucky enough to get them all back. . the business figure on a flat deflated. In total, there were 25 penalties for 225 yards, five fumbles (three losses) and two interceptions in the game.

2. Miami's offensive line is a problem / Florida's pressure could be too: On Saturday, the Gators recorded 10 sacks, the largest number for Florida in a game since 1987 and the highest number for a SEC team since Ole Miss on the Mississippi State in 2008. The UF has brought UM back to 60 yards because of these bags and totaled 71 yards in 16 tackles. for the loss in the game. The fact that the offensive line of the Canes has experienced obvious difficulties has not been too surprising for the coaching staff. Williams was under pressure at every crash, which partly explains a game plan that included decisive passes, screens and safe shots earlier. Williams' experience was partly due to his lack of experience, but it became clear that coaches did not trust the offensive line enough. Jabari Zuniga has scored three tackles for the loss, which could well mean that the Gators are perfectly ahead even though they lost Cece Jefferson and Jachai Polite in the offseason.

3. Williams was (probably) the right choice for canes: It's hard to take away too far from Williams' first performance, given his offensive online play and the frequency with which the Gators have saved him from extremely difficult darkness and distances, but the rookie Redshirt sometimes looked like an experienced veteran in his first college football match. . Although he was sacked 10 times, the 4-star former hopeful made 19 of 29 attempts by scoring 29 yards for 214 yards with a touchdown and no losses. if there was no bag, he probably would have also achieved a solid total. The game plan was conservative, but he often played when he had no other choice, especially when he came out of the pocket or forced him to the outside. No, he did not necessarily show that he made the difference, but he did not need to do it in his first major action. His ability to handle the game in a difficult place should signal to the rest of the ACC that "The U" could actually be back (ish) in 2019.

4. Franks again confuses with his game, but he never quit: Whether Franks was afraid to attack Miami high school or his coach, Dan Mullen, was hesitant to call assists, the junior red quarterback did not do much that night. . He had his moments, including a perfect 65-yard pass that led to a touchdown, but also fumbled a zone play and threw two interceptions – one on a difficult pass that could be his receiver's fault, and another in a panic throw at no one that Mullen the lambaste for film criticism. It is certainly not the Franks who closed the year 2018 on a summit, but it was also not the worst we have seen of itself if this interception was horrible. Mullen will probably give him every chance to bounce back, as the Gators have finally won with Franks facilitating or scoring all three touchdowns.

We were with you all the way to update this story with the latest scores, highlights, and analysis from Florida Vs. Miami. If you can not see the updates below, click here please.

Thank you for being past.

[ad_2]

Source link