[ad_1]
The former New York Times editor, Jill Abramson, on the cover of Trump
Jill Abramson, author of "Merchants of Truth" and former editor of The New York Times, discusses revelations of a transcript of the leak of a transcript of a meeting between Dean Baquet and staff showing the evolution of the president's coverage by the newspaper.
A few days after the leak of a transcript of an internal meeting in the New York Times between the editor and staff members, sparking controversy for revealing a controversial strategy to cover the White House, the Former head of the Times Press Room, Jill Abramson, told Fox News that newspaper readers wanted hard reporting on the president. Asset.
Abramson on Wednesday congratulated Times' editor-in-chief, Dean Baquet, for "doing a remarkable job," Wednesday told America's "Newsroom" the "circumstances, in terms of White House coverage, [are] more difficult than when I was editor. "
& # 39; THE FIVE & # 39; ANNOUNCES TRANSCRIPTION RATE OF ANTITRUMP COVERAGE IN NEW YORK
"Face it, [Baquet] Fox News and the Conservatives blame all the time for being too hard on Trump and having a bias against him. Still, his liberal enough readership wants the paper to be even tougher on President Trump, "said Abramson, who became Times editor in 2011 and was replaced by Baquet when she was fired three years later.
Abramson is said to be "impressed" by the fact that Baquet explained to his staff "that the job of the New York Times is above all to be independent, to empower power and to report information accurately." The Times was not happy to hear that, but I think it's perfectly fine.
Abramson denied that Baquet would have covered Trump as a racist, claiming that it was a "misinterpretation".
What he explained was that the paper was created to cover an in-depth investigation in Washington, they were now turning around the cover of the general election, where the New York Times work must unfold. in the country, to understand what people feel and what they think.This was not to tell people to prepare to cover a racist administration, "she said.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
Abramson insisted that the New York Times covered Trump fairly, although the president himself "makes his cover very difficult".
"How do you cover a president who, according to the Washington Post this week, said he made more than 10,000 lies, false statements or lies?"
[ad_2]
Source link