[ad_1]
During a long interview with Fox News Wednesday morning, the former New York Times editor Jill Abramson repeatedly frustrated American press room Sandra Smith and Jon Scott, the anchor presenters, when they rebuffed their attempts to criticize President Trump's newspaper cover.
In recent days, Fox News has focused on a laser transcription of the recent newspaper meeting organized by the newspaper, saying Time The editor-in-chief Dean Baquet, admitting that the newspaper had rocked the stories of the investigation of Russia on racism in order to eliminate the president.
Abramson, who has not hesitated to criticize the newspaper she once ran, began the segment by immediately praising Baquet as "really doing a brilliant job" in the circumstances of Trump's presidency.
Noting that Baquet is "criticized at all times by Fox News and that the Conservatives have been too hard on Trump and biased" against him, Abramson went on to say how impressed she was with Baquet to have told staff that their work was to be "independent and to hold power to account".
"Essentially, he told reporters and staff members that we had started trying to cover Trump's collusion with Russia and that it had sort of disappeared," Scott said. "So now, we're going to cover President Trump as a racist. Is it essentially what he says, do you agree with that? "
The EXTime the publisher did not agree with that.
"No, I think you misinterpreted what he said," she replied. "What he explained was that the newspaper had been created to cover a thorough investigation in Washington."
Abramson added, "And now, they were turning to an election where the work of The New York Times must be in the country to understand what people feel and what they think. This was not telling people to prepare to cover a racist administration. It was a completely false description of what he was saying. I have read this transcript twice.
Smith, meanwhile, tried a different tactic, reading an excerpt from the transcript in which Baquet says they must "regroup" as a result of the coverage of the Russian investigation while registering it in criticism conservative.
"You've heard some members of Congress, including Ted Cruz and others, talk quite aggressively about this revelation revealing an intentional change in coverage of Russia's narrative that now covers the president, is that right?" Asked Smith.
"I think it's exaggerated," replied Abramson. "If you look at all of what Dean said, he urged his staff to create a pivot to cover the country of all the United States, not only in Washington, but also how people feel to understand why they elected Donald Trump. in 2016 and why they could do it again in 2016. "
Finally, Fox's anchors changed course and tried to convince Abramson Time for having changed a title earlier this month, once again, since the former editor-in-chief said that the current editorial had made the right decision in making this change.
At the end of the interview, Smith released one last, Hail Mary.
"I know your book is writing about traditional journalism, the changing media landscape and the shortcomings of today's journalism," said the presenter. "I'm just going to ask you, do you The New York Times cover enough news? The New York Times cover enough President Trump?
"I think it pretty much covers President Trump, which makes it very difficult to cover," replied Abramson, adding that it was "extremely difficult" to cover a president who reportedly reported more than 10,000 lies and lies since his entry into office.
[ad_2]
Source link