[ad_1]
The whitening by the UCI and the AMA of Christopher Froome for his "abnormal" doping control with salbutamol divides the world of cycling and crystallizes the critics. But an interview published in the British daily The Times throws a little more blur on the case. Charged with determining the rate of salbutamol allowed in cycling several years ago, the Australian scientist Ken Flitch admitted to having made "a terrible ball" in his tests.
"The sport with the highest prevalence was swimming, so that's what we tested. But what happens after an hour of swimming? A full bladder. Cycling for five hours is completely different. You have little urine but very concentrated. And a major mistake with our studies was that we did not take this factor into account in urine control. WADA must accept that the rules must change, "he said, before explaining that" the most important thing is that they (the experts, ed) have accepted that Salbutamol that you take and the level of concentration in your urine is not necessarily correlated. They should have accepted it years ago. What to do in the sense of the British, but that does not facilitate the case, while Diego Ulissi and Alessandro Petacchi, suspended several months for a positive control of salbutamol but with doses lower than that of Froome.
[ad_2]
Source link
