[ad_1]
Atlantico.fr: The students of the private high school in Paris Rocroy-Saint-Vincent de Paul will be provided with a keychain connected at the beginning of the school year which will make it possible to track the absences of the students. A flickering rule that obviously arouses anger. But concretely, is it a good idea, pedagogically speaking, to impose this type of gadgets on individuals who are in an age when they are mentally structured? Is not this sending a very negative message to these?
Pascal Neveu: It does not seem to me that the connection of a pupil is the least pedagogy! Just like the dematerialized detection of absenteeism. On the contrary, pedagogy is concerned with the education of children, and teaching methods. Not "copying" as you rightly say.
I fully understand the outcry of parents and students, while questioning me about this former student who developed such an application. What is his psychic and financial profit?
This keychain (I hope it is beautiful … already the idea of "badger" a child via a keychain … when the chip in the hand?) brings several questions:
- What about the human dimension of the call and the recognition of the identity of the child by its teacher and therefore the teaching relationship that must be created through the eyes and the name?
We exist through the eyes of others who tell us who we are and who we are not. In other words, the importance of the teacher who names his pupil, recognizes him and "the pupil" in the noble sense of the term.
- What about possible hackers who would be able to follow all these students and therefore be able to know all their lives? And what to do with it?
Apart from predators strongly denounced and condemned … Freedom is one of the tryptic of our Republic.
But the protection of children and adolescents is just as much. This system appears at all levels so dangerous.
The introspection of the direction of this institution seems more important than the use of a system that could be related to this coding, referring us to the worst moments in our history. I do not dare to think of such things and am in the idea that everyone was good enough to do things.
Jurists will rule on the illegality of what appears to be imposed with impunity by a Catholic school under contract which, we hope, is not in the inquisition or under the oath of the doctrine of faith. 19659005] It is a question of children, of their education, of their development … certainly through values and rules, but not counterproductive copying.
What consequences could this have for students from the point of view of their personal development? What relationship with the authority this kind of approach could it develop?
The adolescents live a turbulence characterized by the desire to emancipate family soil, challenging it, while remaining strongly attached in a desire for emancipation and personal construction.
More clearly, it is a question of redefining the Father's name and making it his own, even though in most cases the child will only continue to live and evolve the parental model.
Now, if one entrusts to a child what he will live as being a kind of electronic bracelet, he will either submit to it or oppose it
This system can not that provoke extreme feelings and therefore extreme behavior of submission or opposition / rejection.
Authority is at the heart of the pupil's problem. In the majority of cases, everything is going well. But there are these extremes that are worrying and, taken in time, these young people are well managed.
Adding such a shackle can only be felt as an unbearable super-paternal eye for these young people. "No Superior Father" could they proclaim.
We will then have an absence of half-measure: those who adhere completely, and the others who will oppose it in a radical way.
No place in an in-between because "flicage" does not allow any in-between.
The young person is just "psychotic" this lack of freedom he claims. The student needs to experiment with prohibitions, transgressions. He is fully aware of his actions, his mistakes, his foolishness, his faults and punishments.
We need a creative youth, who thinks and therefore relates to his life … positive … and his mistakes
Otherwise, children "badged" risk becoming adults incapable of critical thinking , because structured and anguished.
Worse, revolting at a given moment.
Let's imagine "badged."
We already are via our smartphones and others … our life has no secrets … BUT we are aware of it, as adults.
To put it in place with children would have what consequences regarding the acceptance of a future implanted chip?
On the contrary, would it not be not the period when we should leave more and more autonomy to students? Would not it be better from the point of view of their personal development?
As I said, adolescence is the period of self-experimentation … made of transgressions, of no sides, of mistakes , but also of truths.
The personality begins to be built since childhood, especially the non of the 2 years, the affirmation of the 3 years, but especially the adolescence.
Also, an obstacle such as a key-ring during this period would be deleterious and only create "the same".
We have, for a greater number, experienced even skipping school … We have experimented with lies. We faced punishment and punishment.
Are we dead?
Have we become delinquents?
And if ever we had received such a "gadget" … would not we have wanted to transgress it? to manipulate it?
Did not St. Vincent de Paul write "I have trouble with your pain"?
But it is not worth it … except that of ending up with an electronic bracelet … I hope … is not connected to …
Thank you this invention of this private school and especially thank you the shielding parents … because for reminder even if it is national education (and therefore in accordance with the law) Education is the register of parents, the teaching of the school!
Everyone must remember, it seems to me …
[ad_2]
Source link
