[ad_1]
The government will present an amendment this week modifying its plan to fight the precariousness of employment.
While the bill "professional future" arrives in session in the Senate on Tuesday, the government will present this week an amendment that profoundly changes its controversial plan to fight the precariousness of employment. It will ask the social partners to renegotiate the rules of unemployment insurance in September with the aim of leading to a reform in the spring of 2019.
»READ ALSO – Short contracts and advantageous loans to boost employment [19659004] "Everything will be on the table", explains Aurélien Taché, LaREM deputy and rapporteur of the text. Exit therefore the threat provided in the initial project to introduce by decree a bonus-malus on employer contributions to unemployment insurance to fight against short contracts. And this, if the branches do not find a satisfactory device by the end of the year. Nor is it a question of revising the rules governing the accumulation of unemployment and wages for people with reduced activities
"I hope that the social partners will revise the rules of unemployment insurance so that (…) we can not only we must ensure that they reward the recovery of activity much more, but also that they encourage the creation of quality employment ", announced Emmanuel Macron in front of the Congress, a few days before the social summit scheduled for 17 July. The social partners, in particular the unions, who accuse the president of denigrating social democracy have been taken on the word. If they accept this negotiation, they will have to follow the orientations of the government, which will be defined in a scoping document. If they refuse, he will take his hand and do what he wants.
»READ ALSO – The Government raises the tone on short contracts
According to our information, the government document should aim at creating the famous bonus-malus to which employers have escaped so far as well as the cumulative compensation-wages. But not only. The executive is considering a broader negotiation on all matters relating to unemployment insurance (duration of compensation, amount …). This raises the question of a revision of the current compensation rules. The return promises to be hectic.
[ad_2]
Source link