[ad_1]
WASHINGTON – Francisco Lindor, of course, should ask the Mets whatever kind of financial package he sees fit, and the big gap between what he wants and what the Mets want to give him doesn’t reflect that at all .
Therefore, think of this as an assessment rather than some kind of moral rendering:
$ 385 million over 12 years, versus Lindor at the Mets’ $ 325 million over 10 year proposal, doesn’t sound like the kind of package a player with his resume gets a year before free will. It’s more like what a player with Lindor’s accomplishments gets if he actually takes the free agency step and nails it.
So if the 27-year-old doesn’t want to at least come close to the “big deal” the Mets have given him, in the tweeted words of team owner (and Lindor’s recent dinner partner) Steve Cohen , so the Both sides should hold those talks and get to know each other better over the course of a full season with the confidence that, if it goes as well as planned, no one can outbid Cohen in the next offseason.
“I really have no worries, no worries about the way he’s behaving on a day-to-day basis,” Mets manager Luis Rojas said of Lindor on Tuesday, in response to a question about Lindor not signing. the extension by his self-imposed departure. – season deadline. “He’s pretty solid. It is consistent with his behavior.
Exhibit A came minutes later, as Lindor, sporting a pair of canary yellow kicks (likely from her personal collection with New Balance), emerged as her usual energetic, jubilant self as the Mets practiced. at Nationals Park in preparation for Thursday night. opener against the nationals.
Lindor’s teammate Pete Alonso proclaimed, “I hope they pay him $ 400 million,” and if Lindor builds 2021 Most Valuable Player caliber, excels in the playoffs and captures loyalty Eternal Mets fans, then he’ll have the Mets where he wants them, with other contenders (Yankees? Dodgers?) spinning around in free will, and could very well break that ceiling. This assumes that the sport does not stop due to the expiration of the collective agreement.
Right now, however, Lindor is asking to be paid a record amount of “new money” – commitments made to players already under contract with their current squad. The Dodgers paid Mookie Betts ($ 365 million over 12 years) in 2020 to buy him back from impending free agency and the Angels gave Mike Trout ($ 360 million over 10 years) in 2019 to take him away from the looming free agency. free market after season 20.. These are the two highest amounts ever awarded in sport.
Betts, new to the Dodgers as Lindor is to the Mets, had compiled 41.8 wins over substitution (according to Baseball-Reference.com) at the time of their deal and had excelled in the greater Boston market in the Ultra-competitive American League of the East. . Trout, a local angel (always a simpler call due to the way the two sides know each other), had counted 64.6 WAR. Lindor, coming from the Indians of the small market, is at 28.8 WAR.
The Mets’ offer to Lindor falls short of the $ 340 million the Padres recently guaranteed Fernando Tatis Jr., setting the record for a shortstop – albeit at $ 32.5 million per year (without knowing the breakdown of the deferred money), it eclipses the $ 24.3. million annual average value in Tatis’ 14-year contract and surpasses the $ 30million the Padres gave Manny Machado, a shortstop turned third base, two years ago with their $ 300million pact. dollars over 10 years. If Lindor wants to dominate Tatis, that’s understandable. Maybe some middle ground can be found by passing Tatis while missing Betts and Trout.
Cohen – who made the matter public with his tweets, a questionable decision – wrote on Tuesday: “Lindor is a heckuva player and a great guy. I hope he decides to sign. If he doesn’t, Cohen will face considerable heat from the many Mets fans who want to see superstars sign huge contracts as a symbol of this new era.
Considering his vast personal wealth, perhaps this pressure should motivate Cohen to approach and achieve Lindor’s idea. If he doesn’t, it will be hard to blame him, intellectually, for not wanting to set a record here.
[ad_2]
Source link