"Cheap Populism" – CDU outrage at Habeck's criticism of Merkel's refugee policy



[ad_1]

Robert Habeck

The leader of the Greens criticized the federal government's refugee policy.

BerlinGreen Party leader Robert Habeck has outraged the CDU by sharply criticizing Chancellor Angela Merkel's (UDC) policy on refugees. "Those who, like Habeck, are talking in front of a national election that rejects Angela Merkel's 2015 refugee policy, are campaigning for the AfD," said First Vice President -Federal President of the Union of Democratic Christian Workers (CDA), Handelsblatt.

Baumler accused the Green leader of "cheap populism". "You can not oppose the admission of refugees before the vote and block the expansion of countries of origin safe in the Bundesrat after the elections," criticized the vice of the CDA. He stressed at the same time that the reception of refugees and their repatriation were not decided by the "Greens electoral campaign mode" but by the Geneva Convention on refugees.

The criticism of the CDU's legal politician, Sebastian Steinecke, went in the same direction. "Who is blocking the #Mahgreb as a safe country of origin and everything else?", He asked on Twitter and dismissed Habeck's critics as "embarrbading".

The critics also came from the FDP. The Habecks' statements were the eve of the "telephone number" legislative elections, Hessian FDP MP Bettina Stark-Watzinger wrote on Twitter. "Greens block the recognition of safe countries of origin, and #CDU is involved."

Habeck had reproached the federal government in the "Bild" for "acting too long on the principle of the head in the sand". The war in Syria had already intensified before 2015 and the situation in the refugee camps had become increasingly dramatic. "But the federal government has ignored the warnings and has not prepared the country.It has failed to strengthen the human, financial and structural capabilities of the authorities so that they can conduct orderly procedures for humanitarian admission. "

Habeck added: "In addition, it should have proposed European alternatives to the Dublin procedure because the system was clearly neither fair nor usable, this visual conduct is the problem."

[ad_2]
Source link