[ad_1]
Politics
![Abdulkerim Simsek (2nd from left), Gamze Kubasik (3rd from left) and Arif S. (3rd from right) with their lawyers at the press conference [19659003] Abdulkerim Simsek Kubasik (3rd from left) and Arif S. (3rd from right) with their lawyers at the press conference <cite> (Photo: picture alliance / dpa) </cite><br />
</figcaption></div>
<p>
Tuesday, July 10 2018 </p>
<p>
<strong><br />
In the NSU trial on Wednesday, the verdict was pronounced. But right extremist terror is still far from clear, find relatives of murder victims. They are certain that the perpetrators of the badbadination had more supporters. </strong>
</p>
<p> Shortly before the verdict was pronounced in the NSU trial, the survivors of the murder victims criticized an insufficient clarification of the facts. "I'm 100 per cent sure that there are always accomplices," said Abdulkerim Simsek, the son of the first victim of NSU's murder, Enver Simsek, in Munich. Simsek strongly criticized the fact that the records of the protection of the Constitution were kept secret. "Apparently, there are things to hide." </p>
<div clbad=](https://bilder3.n-tv.de/img/incoming/origs20523218/4722531845-w1280-h960/106411441.jpg)
Gamze Kubasik, daughter of Mehmet Kubasik, victim of the murder of NSU in Dortmund, described as a "disappointment" the process that ended Wednesday after five years . "I have been waiting for answers for years and I am deeply disappointed now," Kubasik said. She wanted the process, as well as the 100% promise of Chancellor Angela Merkel. "Now there is a big gap in me". Kubasik said that she thought she had "100%" badistants.
Kubasik demanded that additional badistants beyond the five accused in the NSU trial be now indicted. She did not want to continue to feel the need to meet other abusers every day on the street. She also wanted to know exactly how her father had been chosen as a victim – the process had not discovered him.
Kubasik also accused the constitutional protection of concealment. All files on the NSU-Tatserie must now be on the table. Simsek and Cubasik were both convinced that there would be a conviction of the defendants on Wednesday.
"Comfortable Excuses"
Cubasik's lawyer, Sebastian Scharmer, stated that the federal prosecutor's case of an isolated trio of the NSU is not only refuted by the lawsuit , she is also known as a comfortable apology for insufficient thorough investigation unmasks. The state has not seized the opportunity to regain trust through transparency.
Scharmer called for a "moratorium on extermination" for NSU files kept by the authorities. Otherwise, the shredders threatened to start heating again after the verdict. Scharmer was referring to the fact that shortly after the NSU fled into the constitution the protection files were shredded to the facts.
Source link
