[ad_1]
A new study shows that the municipality
The smear may not be the best method for early detection of cervical cancer. A test for the human papillomavirus has proven to be much more reliable.
A new study could fuel debate on the best method for early detection of cervical cancer. According to a study conducted by Canadian researchers ( Jama ), the cervico-common smear that detects cellular changes in Germany is less reliable than the direct detection of human papillomavirus (HPV). They examined 19,000 women randomly using the standard procedure or test for cervical cancer viruses in 99% of cases. Depending on the outcome of the test, women were referred for further examination and treatment or received emergency treatment. At the latest after four years, the participants were re-examined – this time with both procedures, to be on the safe side. It was found that in the HPV test group, only half of the women had a precancerous lesion as in the Pap group. The virus test had thus identified vulnerable women more reliably.
The study also seems to relativize a criticism of the HPV test. Until now, it was feared that its high sensitivity triggers many false alarms. Women should undergo unnecessary intervention, concern. In this study, however, all-period interventions measured in both groups were about as frequent.
The best method of early detection has been the subject of debate for years. In Germany, it is planned to offer women from age 35 a combination of HPV tests and Pap tests in the future. The discussion would be less urgent if more women were vaccinated against HPV. Currently, the rate is 45%. Therefore, the vaccine is now also recommended for boys.
Source link
