[ad_1]
before 33 min
Exclusive
Andrea Nahles wants to improve the SPD's presence in the Bundestag with an unusual measure because of the AfD. The other factions do not want to follow that.
Bernhard Junginger
The shift work is not familiar to most SPD deputies in their own professional lives, there is virtually no malicious worker among them. But now they have to get used to changing jobs. Because the leader of the party and the faction, Andrea Nahles, leads the fight against compulsory service schedules. In a resolution of the SPD faction, which is present in our newspaper, "measures to ensure a greater presence in plenary sessions" are described
Thus, the 153 members of the SPD are divided into three groups roughly equal. Alternately, a group must then sit in Parliament, the other is ready to be convened and must meet in plenary within fifteen minutes, for example with regard to roll-call votes. The third group only has to show its presence on special occasions. Who can not, must excuse in writing and must support themselves. And the presence will be observed in the future, if necessary, threatened with "additional measures", it is said
The Greens react with incomprehension to the SPD shift service
The fact that Nahles so vigorously hold the reins, has a volatile background. Empty ranks, especially in technical debates, are not new to the Bundestag – but the AfD has taken them regularly since their entry into the Bundestag as an opportunity to make appropriate images in social networks to set the tone against the "Old parties". Especially for the SPD it becomes a problem. Its decline is not over yet after the nightmarish result of 20% in the general election. In opinion polls, the SPD has now fallen to 17%, and the AfD has reached exactly that level.
The fact that they are not constantly present in parliament outside of reference hours is justified by their numerous other appointments for years: expert committee meetings, expert discussions, appearances at events, congresses and committees.
Britta Haßelmann, Parliamentary Director of the Greens in the Bundestag: "We are a functioning parliament, in other words, parliamentary work does not only take place in plenary." According to his agenda, his group decides "If the full parliamentary group is to be present in plenary or if the specialized representatives concerned lead the debate in plenary, while other colleagues are working in committees." […]
She is astonished SPD movement: "I wonder why the SPD is now considering its presence in plenary. For us, it is not only important in this legislature that the work of the committee and the plenary of our group complement each other well. Marco Buschmann, executive director of the FDP party, tells our newspaper not only about the deficits of the SPD in the presence: In recent weeks, the weak presence of coalition groups has become particularly clear, especially in the demands of the FDP and the Greens . He even managed to summon Minister Seehofer to Parliament.
The Opposition Leads Seehofer to its Weak Coalition Presence
Buschmann refers to a debate at the end of June on the rescue of refugees. After a Greens motion, the Federal Minister of the Interior Horst Seehofer had to appear. The fact that ministers are summoned is rare – usually it prevents the majority of the government. Bushman: "All members of the coalition probably did not notice that they had more than 80% majority, as in the last legislature," Bushman says. In the end, however, the SPD will have to "decide for itself how to ensure its presence in plenary."
There is no official information on the respite services at the SPD in the faction of the Union. Michael Grosse-Brömer, parliamentary general director of the CDU / CSU parliamentary group, does not want to comment on the request of our newspaper. For the CDU and the CSU, however, it is said that such regulations would not be considered necessary and were therefore not planned. Because never a vote was lost because too few people were present.
Topics Subscribe
[ad_2]
Source link
