Case Sami A .: Therefore, the parties are arguing in the parliament of the NRW State so stubborn – Region

Düsseldorf. Something went wrong on Friday 13.

So tortuous that a special session on the deportation of Sami A.

Case Sami A .: "Their behavior is indecent "

SPD delegate Sven Wolf accused the Minister of Refugees Joachim Stamp that his actions were" indecent ". Opposition and government members literally shouted – so much so that the president had to call them to order several times

What is the case of Sami A.

Last Friday (July 13), Sami A. put in plane and sent to Tunisia: he was deported.

For more than ten years, the authorities have been trying to capture the Tunisian Sami A. expel. According to an eyewitness, the 42-year-old man would have been bodyguard of Osama Bin Laden.

In Bochum, he would have been a Salafist preacher, he was clbadified as a threat. A dangerous man, who endangers the security of the country

Sami A. denies all this – and he resisted his deportation for years

Government finally did, which failed for ten years, proclaimed Joachim Stamp at the special session: "NRW became safer."

————— ——

More topics:

Top News:

———- ———-

Special session on the case of Sami A.: Why do the parties quarrel so much?

The problem is this: on the Wednesday preceding the deportation of Sami A., the Gelsenkirchen Administrative Court ruled that A. could not be deported at all.

Ministry of Integration but only on Friday morning. But Sami A. was already en route to Tunisia

Some deputies accused Stamp of having deliberately secretly initiated deportation behind the administrative tribunal, acting as a single man. If that were true, the rule of law would have been repealed.

+++ Case Sami A .: Minister NRW Stamp becomes clear: "makes every effort to get rid of him" +++

critics see the error Stamps

] Especially, critics see this as a mistake. Stamps: The ministry had despite its unannounced request that the deportation was already planned. Therefore, the decision to ban expulsion arrived too late at the Ministry.

The argument of Joachim Stamp: "We proceeded as discreetly as possible and only spoke with the places where it was absolutely necessary" – such as the police. Because in the past, in such eviction proceedings, there were always "punctures" that had been torpedoed by the deportations.

He was especially concerned about the deportation of Sami A. by all legal means. There were indications that he posed a threat to NRW and Germany. Because there was no more ban at the time of the expulsion, Stamp stated that he was solely responsible within the committee.

Is there a solution after the extraordinary session on the case Sami A.

The dispute also concerns the balance between freedom on the one hand and the security of the other. ;somewhere else. For even an author like Sami A. must have the opportunity in a state of law to defend himself against the state, if there is reason to believe that he is treated unfairly.

Must we conclude that in the case of Sami A. The SPD and Greens MPs accuse the government of having overturned the rule of law

A culmination reached the conflict within the commission, as accused SPD deputy, Sven Wolf Joachim Stamp, of "vigilante". Timbre countered: "Do not hesitate to point me out.Then the courts should clarify this."

For the moment, the dispute over the case of Sami A. continues to boil after the committee.