Commentary: Trump's strategy on Sessions-Rauswurf | Comments | DW



[ad_1]

It has long been said that Justice Minister Jeff Sessions will not remain in office after the mid-term elections. Again and again, Donald Trump had slandered or mocked him. The fact that the US President is acting so soon after the outcome of the interim elections – Democrats will control the House of Representatives in the future – does not shock observers, but it is a small surprise. It's the same as always.

With the ejection of the sessions, Trump immediately opened a new battlefield to divert attention from the elections and thus the Republicans' loss of power to Congress. The world's attention should revolve around him again – typical of a man who can not stand not to be in the public eye. And by shooting sessions, Trump goes on the offensive. A tactic that he applies again and again when he is under pressure.

Michael Knigge How to Image App

Michael Knigge, Washington DW correspondent

Investigations into Russia in danger

To understand how ruthless Trump's gesture is, one must know that a sacking session has always been rejected by Democrat and Republican deputies. As a former senator, Sessions still has many friends in Congress, including the influential Republican and Trump supporter, Lindsay Graham. This had repeatedly acted on Trump not to dismiss the Minister of Justice. Despite many shortcomings, many deputies saw in the sessions a guarantee that special investigator Robert Mueller's investigations into possible Russian interference in the campaign for the 2016 presidential election without the & # 39; 39, influence of the White House.

Sessions were found to be biased in the case and thus badigned the responsibility for the investigation to his deputy Rod Rosenstein. He had always made it clear that he would not intervene in the investigation and that Rosenstein would not fire or fire. This refusal was of course considered a personal affront by the president, himself having little interest or patience for the mills of the law. Because Trump sees all this as a potential danger, it has always been clear that the sessions must end up going and that Rosenstein will follow him for sure.

But it is not yet the moment. Of course, a president has the right to dismiss his Minister of Justice. Trump knows it: he seems to insist that the resignation of the Sessions of Democrats and Republicans is not so bad it could be dangerous for him. He might be right. However, it is alarming that Matthew Whittaker, Session's successor, has already questioned Mueller's research and considered how he might complicate or delay it. That's probably why Trump chose Whittaker.

A challenge of the congress

The mind games of the "new" on the Russian affair and the possible cuts to Mueller's budget could give an indication of the White House's strategy. Instead of dismissing Rosenstein and ending the investigations, which could likely trigger a trial for impeachment against the president, Trump advances Whittaker, who is slowly bleeding the Mueller investigation – financially and structurally. And he hopes to get out of it.

Democrats and Republicans can not allow this. Trump launched the challenge to the MEP on the day of the interim election. For democracy and the rule of law, it is imperative that they react quickly and decisively.

[ad_2]
Source link