[ad_1]
"Due to false information provided by the employment agencies of the Federal Agency for Employment (BA), criminal gangs were wrongly awarded Hartz IV indemnities by raising to at least 50 million euros last year.This is apparent from the federal government's response to a small request from the FDP's parliamentary group, the "Rheinische Post" of Düsseldorf (Thursday). "The BA believes On the basis of random inquiries, only by bandage performance abuse, a financial loss of about 50 million euros appeared, "says the answer.
On 26.10.2018, the Federal Ministry of Labor and Social Affairs sent the answer to the little question of MP Pascal Kober u. at. and the fraction of the FDP regarding "benefit abuse in social code II", BT-Drs. 19/4649
The request suggests in the preliminary remark of the questioner a legitimate interest in the beneficiary:
"§14 Paragraph 4 SGB II and §7 BHO obliges employment agencies to respect the principles of economy and efficiency in the granting of benefits, as abusive appropriation of benefits It is bad for everyone, especially the weakest, and social fraud – whether it's avoiding contributions or taxes or illegally collecting benefits – is a steal for the poor. 39, welfare state are subtracted, abused or lost through negligence, they end up missing the needy.
However, this is quickly lost in questions and answers. The question is already focused on an author model that mutilates the real offense.
Job centers mislead employees with benefits
The much larger "social security fraud" is probably carried out by the employment center itself. Employees are urged to mislead customers by giving them false information, fake reports from sales representatives and even false testimony in court are provable.
The Käris Märkische has for example Over the period 2005-2013, thousands of beneficiaries were cheated with thousands of euros and were fined disproportionately and illegally, under false pretenses of rent ceilings. There has never been a mandatory rental fee during this period.
Even for the period 2014-2017, there are still no legal requirements. With the end of consolidation of the rental price, some property companies (Vonovia, LEG, etc.) have made significant rent increases, which have a significant influence on rental prices. But the Job Center Märkischer Kreis and the company "Analysis & Concepts" refuse the publication of the raw data and thus escape the jurisdictional review exercised by the national social court NWR Essen in the procedure LSG NRW, L 6 AS 120/17.
Source link
