"Owners of the highest state offices use Pegida vocabulary" | TIME ONLINE



[ad_1]

After the president of the Constitutional Court, Andreas Voßkuhle, FDP head Christian Lindner criticized the language in the political debates. "We run the risk of living in a damaged and drunken democracy," said Lindner Bild am Sonntag (BamS) in reference to US President Donald Trump, as reported in a preliminary announcement. "The owners of the highest state offices use the Pegida vocabulary, which threatens to tarnish the political culture." It deserves the respect that the Bavarian Prime Minister Markus Söder (CSU) admits now.

Except for Söder Lindner called according to Vorabmeldung no name. Söder had already been criticized for using the term "asylum tourism" in the context of the refugee crisis. Refugee organizations accused Söder of equating the escape from war and terror with holiday tourism. Lindner had also criticized Söder by stating at an event of Augsburger Allgemeine : "Words like asylum seekers come from
of the directory of the political casting language ".

Last Thursday, the President of the Federal Constitutional Court, Andreas Voßkuhle complained about the wording of the discussions on refugee policy. Voßkuhle spoke of the name of the leader of the CSU, Horst Seehofer, in Süddeutsche Zeitung against the term "rule of injustice", with which Seehofer had attacked Chancellor Angela Merkel (CDU) there two and a half years. Seehofer then stated that the president of the Constitutional Court should not be a "language police".

The leader of the FDP Lindner further BamS states that popular and authoritarian thinking becomes socially acceptable. On the other hand, you have to defend yourself. "Unfortunately, the republics of the Republic of Austria so often shoot beyond the goal that they reach the opposite," said the politician. Anyone who tackles real immigration problems is labeled as racist by the "left trolls" in social media. Millions of people would no longer be in the public debate. "If it is marked by the right-wing populace and the left-wing storm, then the political center loses its home."

Lindner also criticized the weekly DIE ZEIT. This had put his own editor on the pillory, which wrote in the order of the moral dilemma of the Mediterranean Rescue.

More than two weeks ago, in the ZEIT, in a pro-contra format, two comments appeared in which the question of private maritime rescue in the Mediterranean was discussed. The counter-article was written by the editor of ZEIT, Mariam Lau. The format was overwritten with the title "Or should you leave it?" ZEIT has been criticized for implicitly arguing that refugees should be saved from drowning. As a result, the deputy editor Bernd Ulrich is excused for the title, "because it does not express our seriousness and sorrow on the subject."

[ad_2]
Source link