Protection of the Constitution – Maaßen must leave



[ad_1]

Federal Minister of the Interior, Mr Seehofer, has transferred the former President of Constitutional Protection, Mr Mabaden, to immediate temporary retirement. The triggers were Maaßens "unacceptable formulations" in his farewell speech, said Seehofer in Berlin. In this context, cooperation based on trust is no longer possible – regardless of the position in which Mabaden was transferred.

Maaßens' tasks should first take over his former deputy Haldenwang until the succession is decided. Maaßen had spoken in a speech to the heads of European intelligence services of "leftist forces in the SPD" and had indirectly accused the government of having "invented" far-right crimes related to the Chemnitz riots.

Vice-Chancellor Scholz told Brussels that the fact that Mabaden was removed from office was a good thing. He called the decision late. The leader of the left, Kipping, described the decision in the case as "late". But they are too late to repair the damage that the Great Coalition itself caused by the Maaßen cause itself, Kipping told the AFP news agency. The politician of the Green Party of Notz spoke of a "disaster" and sees the responsibility with the Minister of the Interior, Mr. Seehofer. AfD President Meuthen proposed to Maaßen to participate in the celebration.

The manuscript of Maaßens' speech in the formulation:

"Dear colleagues,

Today, I want to say goodbye to this circle after more than six years of belonging. Some farewells are foreseen, for example if the contract of employment is limited or if a certain age is reached, like with our friend Rob, other farewells are not planned and somewhat surprising, like at home.

The leaders of the three parties forming the German Federal Government, Ms Merkel, CDU, Mr Seehofer, CSU and Ms Nahles, SPD, decided on 23 September that I should be replaced as the President of the Federal Office of Protection of the Constitution. This ended a government crisis in Germany. The SPD had threatened to break the coalition if I stayed in office.

During the government crisis, on 7 September, I questioned the validity of the information published by the media and politicians about "hunts" or right-wing pogroms in Chemnitz against the largest German newspaper "Bild-Zeitung". On August 26, 2018, a German had been killed by asylum seekers in Chemnitz. On the same day, demonstrations took place in Chemnitz against the federal government's policy on refugees, both ordinary citizens and right-wing extremists. There were occasional crimes. The next day and the following days, it was not a crime of badbadination in the political and media interest, but rather a right-wing extremist "Hunting Hunting Aliens". According to the local police, the prosecutor's office, the local press, the prime minister of the country and my collaborators, these "hunts" did not take place. They were fictitious.

I have already experienced a lot of manipulation of German media and Russian misinformation. But that politicians and the media "Hate Hunting" invent freely or at least without control the spread of this misinformation was for me a new quality of false reports in Germany. The following week, I commented on the "Bild-Zeitung" in just four sentences, stating that, according to the findings of all the relevant security agencies, there were no such "hunts" of any kind. 39, far right. The following week, I made it clear to the competent parliamentary committees that the fight against right-wing extremism did not justify inventing far-right crimes. The media and the green and left politicians, who felt trapped by their false information, then demanded my release. In my opinion, it was the SPD's left-wing forces, who were immediately opposed to forming a coalition with the CDU / CSU, a prime opportunity to bring about a break with this ruling coalition. As I am known in Germany as a critic of an idealized, naive and foreign security policy, it was also an opportunity for my political opponents and for some media to make me leave my office.

Due to the decision of the three above-mentioned party leaders, I will leave my position upon the appointment of his successor. This should be the case in the coming weeks. The Federal Minister of the Interior, Mr Seehofer, who has supported me a lot and taken a stand in this political debate and who himself has received a lot of criticism from the media, would like me to stay. his adviser. If and under what conditions this should happen, it will be necessary to clarify in detail in the coming weeks. In any case, I can imagine a life outside the public service, for example in politics or business. I had never imagined that fear of myself and the truth would tip part of politics and the media into hysteria and hysteria such that four sentences are enough to trigger a government crisis in Germany.

Ladies and gentlemen, it's hard for me to say goodbye after six years. I loved listening to this circle and found a high level of collegiality and solidarity in all meetings and discussions. I found that we had the same goals, shared the same values ​​and fought against the same opponents of freedom and democracy. I think we have accomplished a lot in the last six years. A lot for the security of my country. In recent years, you have provided considerable support in solving our national security problems, and I have always tried to help you in your work to make your countries and Europe safer. I want to thank you for all this. I also want to thank you for the many personal and friendly moments that I have been able to live. I would be very happy to be able to keep in touch with many of you personally and privately after this moment too. Finally, I would like to express the request that you and my successor pursue cooperation in an equally intensive partnership. Thank you for your attention! "

[ad_2]
Source link