The FDP criticizes Jens Spahn for the treatment of the mentally ill



[ad_1]



Tuesday, the Federal Constitutional Court decides in which situations patients in psychiatry can be confined to bed. Immediately before the FDP criticized Federal Health Minister Jens Spahn (CDU) for the outpatient care of the mentally ill. The party accuses Spahn of inactivity in improving the treatment.

"Apparently, Spahn is doing nothing to promote the adoption of a new psychotherapy directive," said Wieland Schinnenburg, FDP Bundestag MP of the "Pbadauer Neue Presse". The directive, which came into force on April 1, 2017, has not improved much. Some insurance companies still refuse to cover the costs of psychotherapeutic treatment

"We can only talk about scandal"

The number of complaints against health insurance funds faulty Acquisitions increased last year despite the introduction of the new directive, In 2017, the mentally ill referred to the competent Federal Insurance Office in 96 cases, 67 in 2016, writes the newspaper , citing the response of the Federal Ministry of Health at the request of the FDP Group

. federal cash registers. This does not include complaints about the lack of reimbursement of AOK funds under the supervision of the Länder.

Another problem: the long wait before an appointment with a psychotherapist. The Bundestherapeutenkammer had found in a survey in April 2018 that patients had to wait an average of five months for such an appointment – even seven months in the Ruhr.

Schinnenburg cautioned that if a treatment of mental health problems was unsuccessful: "What serious consequences did psychotherapeutic treatment omitted for the people affected and what economic costs caused by long-term sick leave? talk about a scandal, "said the FDP politician. Minister Spahn "does not take enough outpatient psychotherapeutic care yet very poor", criticized Schinnenburg

The Federal Constitutional Court judges two people affected

On the issue of fixing patients who become aggressive in psychiatry and others or put themselves in danger, the Federal Constitutional Court decides on two constitutional complaints of the persons concerned. It is also about the question: when does one have to get the approval of a judge? This is regulated by provincial laws

Currently, a court order is required for housing in closed psychiatry. For the following fixations, however, the order of a doctor is sufficient in most states. In some countries, there is already the so-called reservation of the judge. There, the measures must be examined in a short time by a judge. The applicants rely on Articles 2 and 104 of the Basic Law on the freedom of the person.




Want to answer the Sunday question in the Bund? Vote here:

[ad_2]
Source link