The US legalizes weapons from a 3D printer



[ad_1]

Opponents of the gun criticize the government :
The United States Legalize the Weapons of the 3D Printers



  The Gun Opponents Criticize the Government: The US Legalize the Weapons of the 3D Printer


In the United States, the weapons of the United States 3D printer are legalized (symbol photo).
Photo: Janicki, Dietrich (1966-005) New York Their quality is considered bad, but they can shoot – and anyone can do it in their own living room. Starting in August, digital models for the printing of plastic guns will be available for download. Critics are horrified.

Criminals and terrorists could not imagine it better: The weapon offered by Cody Wilson is not recognized by metal detectors and can not be identified by a serial number. For several years, the Texan has beaten for a license. Now he is on target: The US government has given him the green light.

Opponents of the idea of ​​declaring the firearms of the legal 3D printer, filed a lawsuit Thursday in court. If they do, however, is uncertain. "There is a market for these rifles, not just among gun badists and amateurs," says Nick Suplina, of the organization "Everytown for Gun Safety," which has teamed up with two other groups for help Wilson at the last minute. Stop. The demand for weapons of the 3D printer is also high in the criminal world.

Wilson, founder of the company "Defense Distributed", had already posted a first draft of such a weapon in 2013. The US State Department intervened quickly. As for the arms export laws, he was forced to remove the digital models from the network. From here to here, however, records have been downloaded about a hundred thousand times – even by Internet users outside the United States.

There was a long legal dispute, and then at the end of June, surprisingly surprising. The government, now led by President Donald Trump, has withdrawn its objections. Wilson himself announced via Twitter to make his models of 3D printer weapons available again from August 1st.

Supporters argue that the weapons of the 3D printer are only a modern version of what is already possible anyway – namely, making a simple firearm using materials and familiar methods. In addition, they argue that manufacturing with the 3D printer is far too expensive and that the quality of the weapons is far too bad to be a serious option for criminals.

While a conventional weapon can often fire thousands of times, dropping the previously produced product with 3D printer copies most of the time after a few shots apart. As a rule, the accuracy is rather modest. "If you're a gang member in Los Angeles, are you going to spend tens of thousands of dollars buying a printer and printing a malfunctioning weapon, or are you going to steal it somewhere?" Larry Keane of the National Shooting asks The Sports Foundation, which represents the interests of the gun manufacturers

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, badigned to the US Department of Justice, published a video in 2013 testing a weapon manufactured by Wilson. In fact, there was not much weapon left after the first shot. The test was Wilson's first draft called "Liberator". In the future, he also wants to offer plans for other models via his website.

Opponents are nevertheless worried – since soon everyone, without the usual controls, can take possession of a firearm; because in the case of investigations, virtually no trace will be possible; and because plastic guns can be taken virtually anywhere.

"It's completely crazy," says Rick Myers, chief of the Major Cities Chiefs Association police organization. "If you only think about the rhetoric that we currently hear in our country – better border protection and homeland security." Now, the government is ensuring that anyone who wants to use a weapon goes unnoticed. the perfect solution would be presented.

The approval of the 3D printer's weapons was also made possible by a change of responsibilities. Recently, only military weapons fall under the control of the Department of Foreign Affairs in the United States. In the meantime, the Ministry of Commerce is taking care of those available in free trade. According to an agreement reached with Wilson, his model no longer conforms to Itar's arms export directive

Democrat Senator Bob Menendez asked the Minister of Foreign Affairs , Mike Pompeo, to reconsider the decision. The Robert Spitzer Weapon Law expert from the New York State University sees the critical approval. However, because of high costs and poor quality, there is no fear of a mbadive distribution of new weapons, he said. But the technology will evolve rapidly.

(mba / dpa)

[ad_2]
Source link