Trump's candidate for the Supreme Court



[ad_1]



In the end, it could come to the figure. Because US President Donald Trump likes to evaluate people by their appearance. He chose his ministers for the "good look," like Pentagon boss Jim Mattis: "Directly from the casting office," boasted Trump. "Like in the movie."

Again, he brings back such stereotypes in the game: "Who is most like a Supreme Court candidate?" For example, the Politico website described the selection process for the most recent vacancy on the US Supreme Court, citing Trump's confidant. "Who plays the role best?"

The answer is to come Monday night, the best prime time television – as a grim final of the Realityshow candidates, as Trump organized similarly in the nomination of the latest federal judge Neil Gorsuch.

This time, the decision is even more important. After the surprise retirement of moderate judge Anthony Kennedy, Trump is now able to order his second Supreme Court nominee. And with the highest US court setting the country's political course and naming the nine judges for life, Trump could shape the nation for decades.


<img src = "http://cdn4.spiegel.de/images/image-1312123-640_panofree-nivm-1312123.jpg" width = "640" height = "359" clbad = "spPanoImageTeaserPic" title = " Donald Trump "alt =" Kennedy was a conservative "swing" but sometimes voted "vote" with the four liberal judges. Thus, historical principles in favor of women, minorities and vulnerable populations, reflecting the changing visions of Americans – for example, the legalization of same-bad marriage in 2015.

Now, Trump has the opportunity to return to back: cements his mandate and, despite all his scandals, becomes one of the most influential presidents of history, ensuring that social progress is again canceled, judgment by judgment.

"If you are a woman, a minority, an immigrant, an LGBT person," the New York Times warned, the rights you have been granted may be at risk. "The New York Boulevard Newspaper" Daily News "title in brief:" We Are Fucked. "

The main achievements that could be made by a Supreme Court on the right:

abortion

In 1973, the court legalized the abortion. It is unlikely that it abrogates this fundamental judgment. But he could refer abortion issues to the states – and in the hands of state parliaments. CNN badyst Jeffrey Toobin predicts that abortion will soon be illegal again in 20 states.

LGBT Rights

The Supreme Court recently extended LGBT rights to equal civil rights, for example by legalizing same-bad marriage in 2015. The recent decision in favor of a baker who denied a couple gay the wedding cake does not bode well. However, a reversal should take years.

Arms Control

Up to now, the United States Court of Justice has remained out of the debate over US weapons. The second amendment, which guarantees the wearing of weapons, has never been fully debated, although it seems for a long time obsolete. That could change now – in favor of the gun bearers, if a conservative judge makes the difference.

Health Reform

In Congress, Republicans failed to overturn Barack Obama's 2012 health bill. Still, he's still high on his wish list – and Trump hates everything Obama has done. There are currently several lawsuits against a fundamental piece of the law that could be brought before the Supreme Court.

environment

Almost from the first day, Trump undermined the protection of the environment and climate. States like California and eco-groups have complained, many of these cases are still pending. They too could soon be brought to court.

Russian investigations

Trump himself could issue a legal check: If the Russian special investigator Robert Mueller actually proved it, the Supreme Court would finally decide the unresolved question of whether an American president could be charged – or even forgive if necessary.

Trump wants to install the new judge before the next congressional elections. For so long Republicans have a – very slim – majority in the Senate, which must confirm the candidate. He seems to have reduced a list of 25 names to three favorites. All are conservative.

Brett Kavanaugh

Kavanaugh, 53, is considered the leader. He is a judge in Washington and previously worked for President George W. Bush. Pros: Kavanaugh is experienced and looks "all American". Contra: He was a protégé of Special Investigator Kenneth Starr, whose Lewinsky report he co-wrote. The report led to the impeachment lawsuit of Bill Clinton – a fate that could now threaten Trump with the issue of Russia.

Raymond Kethledge

Kethledge, 51, is the Conservative candidate for consensus. He is a judge of appeal in Michigan. Pro: It is said that Trump "liked" him during the job interview. Fans point out that he is a popular hunter, which should make it difficult for rural state democrats to reject him. Contra: He did not go to an elite university, while Trump demanded that his candidate visit Harvard or Yale.

Amy Coney Barrett

Coney Barrett, 45, was not named until last year by Trump as Judge of Appeal in l & # 39; Indiana. Pro: She is ultra-conservative and telegenic, two important criteria for Trump. When she was named Court of Appeal, three Democrats voted for her. Contra: He is connected to ultra-religious groups. "Their dogma lives among them," said Senator Dianne Feinstein late last year. She also did not attend an elite university.

Other candidates

Amul Thapar 49 years old, is judge of appeal in Kentucky. His parents were immigrants from India. He went to the bench after September 11 and is considered a young conservative star. Thomas Hardiman 52 years old, is a district judge in Pennsylvania. He was already favorite last year, but lost against Gorsuch. He is an energetic advocate of the weapons law. Mike Lee age 47, is not a judge but a senator. Nevertheless, he expressed his interest, Trump called it "very talented". As a senator, confirmation would be almost certain.

[ad_2]
Source link