[ad_1]
General News on Tuesday, May 28, 2019
Source: dailyguidenetwork.com
2019-05-28
Asamoah Boateng and Kwame Asare Obeng, aka A More
Stephen Asamoah Boateng, executive chairman of the State Enterprise Commission, known as Asabee, described some allegations made against him by the controversial musician Kwame Asare Obeng, better known as A More, like malicious and instantiated publications.
According to Asabee, A Plus's allegations that he (Asabee) allegedly used the powers of the state to inappropriately misappropriate the property of a young man in Prampram, Greater Accra Region. , were wrong.
In response to allegations made by A Plus on April 2, 2019, Asabee stated through the intermediary of its attorneys Akufo-Addo, Prempeh & Co: "These same malicious and false allegations were published by a portal information online: theindependentghana.com on April 2, 2019. "
In a letter to A Plus from her lawyers dated May 27, 2019, she stated that "after talking about our client in the said publication, you (A Plus) continued to say, among other things, that "Without a court order or title deed." On the mainland, a so-called tall man from the nuclear power plants did justice and, with his group of "vigilantes", demolished the building. a young man in Prampram.
The letter said "again, you talked about our client as a monster using the power to terrorize the people who gave, who campaigned and who voted for the NPP".
Contrary to A Plus's badertion, Asabee "is the true owner of the land in dispute and its owner is attested by a deed of sale between Numo Teye Oke Tekle, head of Admili-We group of Larkpeh Lower Prampram and Stephen Asamoah. Boateng dated 2008. "
According to the letter, "the demolition you referred to took place in 2014, when the NPP was in opposition, and for that reason, our client was not in a position to use power. which was given to him to terrorize the population. Our client is not and does not act like a monster. "
He noted that "because of your disrespect for the rules of natural justice and journalistic standards, you have published a lie that thorough and conscientious investigations would have revealed as malicious and false."
Retraction
He warned "we are therefore invited to require, what we are doing hereby, that upon receipt of this letter, you withdraw your publication and make an unconditional apology to our client, with the same visibility as the malicious publication and unfounded received ".
A lawsuit
The letter added, "If you fail, refuse and / or neglect to do so within seven days of receipt of this letter, our clients have enjoined us to take legal action against you and the other media outlets that republished the incriminated story. for defamation. "
Source link
