Line relating to plagiarism: Kamal Kant Chandra files a complaint to the police after the coup to send the team 'Bala & # 39; | Hindi movie news

The badistant director and aspiring filmmaker Kamal Kant Chandra filed a criminal complaint under Articles 420 (cheating) and 406 (breach of trust) against the main actor (Ayushmann Khurrana) and the officials of the Kashimira Police Station in Kashimira. Mira Road. Chandra had filed an action in the Bombay High Court against Ayushmann, director Amar Kaushik and producer Dinesh Vijan, accusing them of having withdrawn the central plot of a bald man prematurely from his project, Wig.

Chandra said that during the last hearing held on April 19, the lawyers representing the trio lied in court stating that the film was still in the scriptwriting stage.

In a mid-day report, Chandra was quoted as saying: "It is not good to start firing before the court has handed down its verdict." At the last hearing, they said that They would take the time to develop the scenario.How did they start shooting in 15 days? "This means that they gave a misleading picture to the court. I went to the holiday camp four days ago, but they said I should wait for the next hearing on June 10th. But officials may end [a chunk of] the movie at that time and argue that since a lot of money is at stake, the court should rule in their favor. "

He also reportedly received Khurrana's Whatsapp messages, dating from 2017, when he reportedly expressed interest in the concept of the film. Chandra said: "I registered my concept with the Screen Writers' Association in 2016, while their script was recorded in 2018."

Ayushmann's legal team quoted the same report: "What has been communicated to you is a factual distortion of bad faith, especially with respect to the 9 April debates." As the case is We are not commenting anymore, our scenario is original, and we will show it to the court when the issue comes up. "

The report further published the official statement of Maddock Films in which it was written: "The court granted no reparation to the plaintiff nor issued any order preventing us from continuing the film".