The daughter of a murdered soldier makes fun of Rawlings about the call for revision of the compensation clause



[ad_1]

Jerry John Rawlings says that indemnification clauses have encouraged some characters to abuse their functions and take advantage of them.

<! –

->

<! –

->

Daughter of an army general badbadinated during the Revolution of 4 June 1979, Jerry Rawlings dared to get rid of the immunity he enjoys to face prosecution.

Esther Wellington maintains that the soldiers loyal to Mr. Rawlings killed at the Nima Police Station, including his father, Major-General Odartey Wellington, was ruthless. It was illegal and had to be punished.

"What I know, it's [that] my father was killed illegally. There were other heinous crimes pre-treated at that time [so] Anyone involved in this case has to face all the rigors of the law, "Esther Wellington told JoyNews on Tuesday, June 4.

His reaction follows a call by Rawlings for a complete overhaul of the constitution of the Fourth Republic because it no longer serves the interests of the people. He also wants a review of the "problematic" constitutional clauses, in particular the transitional provisions and the compensation clause.

"This will ensure the equality of all before the law, by promoting transparency, accountability and responsible governance," said the former president at the meeting of 40th anniversary of the uprising of 4 June 1979.

Rawlings June 4, 2019

The revolt resulting from a combination of corruption, poor governance, public frustration, lack of discipline and frustrations within the Ghanaian army. This led to the overthrow of the military regime – Supreme Military Council (SMC II) – led by General F.W.K. Akuffo of the Revolutionary Council of the Armed Forces with the young officer of the army, Flt. Lt Jerry John Rawlings as Chief.

allowance

When the country returned to democratic governance in 1992, the founders of the Constitution inserted provisions that compensate all those responsible for the coup and their officials against any responsibility for acts and omissions committed during their illegitimate administration.

Clause 1 of Article 34 of the 1992 Constitution stipulates that: "No member of the Provisional Council of National Defense, Secretary of the Provisional Council of National Defense or any other person appointed for that purpose shall be held responsible, both omission during the administration of the Provisional Council of National Defense ".

But Mr. Rawlings, who led the uprisings that overthrew two governments – one of its members constitutionally elected under the presidency of Hilla Limann in 1982 – now states "the indemnification clauses have encouraged certain characters to abuse their functions and to profit from them. "

"It is obvious that many of our peoples are losing confidence in our constitutional mandate," he said.

However, Wellington dares the former military leader to publicly declare that he does not want to be covered by the compensation clause so that he can be prosecuted for the murders sanctioned by his regime.

Esther Wellington

She said, "If Mr. Rawlings says that the indemnification clause is preventing others or creating an air of invincibility, I would ask him to remove the log from him before talking about the stain in the eyes of someone. Another one.

"He should introduce himself; he should be a man and say that he does not want to be covered by a compensation clause and then we will take it from there, "she added.

Play audio attached to listen to Esther Wellington

[ad_2]
Source link