Archie's baptism: Royal fans accuse Prince William of "looking bad" in the middle of royal rumors Royal | New



[ad_1]

The two-month-old son of the Duke and Duchess of Susbad was baptized at Windsor Castle on Saturday. Meghan and Harry have published two photos of the event amid major criticism of their decision to keep the baptism private. But some royal fans were distracted by William's face expression on one of the photos.

A Twitter user said, "William does not look happy at all !! And Kate has a forced smile on her face. "

Another wrote, "Have you seen how body language is in the picture? A huge space between the two couples and William looks so bitter in the face! "

A third said, "Kate does not have a real smile on her face. She looks pained. William seems to smell terrible. They do not look happy to be here.

One of them added, "Oh man, look on Prince William's face …"

Another commented, "Wills does not seem amused."

Another request: "What's wrong with William's face?"

This comes as Meghan and Harry face persistent rumors of dissension between the Duke and the Duchess of Cambridge.

Archie, seventh on the throne, was baptized Saturday by Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby, in the castle's private chapel, in front of a small group of friends and family.

Meghan and Harry were determined to keep this affair secret and shared only two snapshots of the day.

A photo of this secret event shows the proud parents and Archie alongside Prince Charles, Camilla, William, Kate, Meghan's mother, Doria Ragland, and the sisters of Princess Diana, Lady Jane Fellowes and Lady Sarah McCorquodale.

In the second part, Meghan and Harry pose with their child in a black and white intimate shot.

Although some royal fans questioned William's face in the photos, others reacted with joy to Archie's first glimpse.

Meghan and Harry were accused of having acted as "Hollywood stars" at the christening of public relations consultant Mark Borkowski, while royal expert Ingrid Seward said the situation had been "badly" managed. "

[ad_2]
Source link