[ad_1]
Send your mail to [email protected]
Reasons for optimism at Man Utd
Since the departure of Ferguson, Manchester United continues to struggle, be it in the transfer market, the appointment of directors or even when it comes to negotiating contracts with existing players. Until a football director is appointed, it is unlikely that they will sort this mess. However, despite all these worries, I think United will be in the top four this year.
Liverpool and City are too far for United to catch up until they solve the problems outlined above. Tottenham has a good first 11 but lacks depth but will probably finish in front of United. However, 4th place goes to United.
Chelsea has a novice manager who may need some time to settle down. But more importantly, they just lost their best player. Have been banned from transfer so that they can not sign replacements. Do not have an attacker capable other than an aging Giroud and an unproven Bathsuayi. Even with Hazard, they scored the lowest number of goals in the last season and this statistic is likely to worsen this year. Their team also lacks depth and 6th place is where they will likely end up.
That leaves Arsenal to compete for CL's place and given the limited budget with which Emery has to operate, Arsenal would not be expected to meet this challenge. They have a solid front line that should push United but will probably fail. Even if United finishes 5th, there is still the safeguard of the UEFA Cup, where his main competitors will be Arsenal.
With respect to United, they seem to be on the right track to repair the bottom line. Bissaka is a great addition (though it's a bit pricey), but finding someone like Maguire will fix the problems badociated with United CBs last year. Shaw remains an unknown entity and this season will show whether he can finally flourish or whether he will be their weakest link in defense.
The line of attack has huge potential, but they still have no scorer in the mold of Kane or Salah, who can guarantee them 20 goals each season. This seems unlikely to be settled this year.
The midfielder also remains a dilemma. If Pogba stays and Bruno Fernandes is added to the list, he will miss him again a central midfielder first clbad. None of the rumors on the transfer market seem to suggest that United will be able to get one this summer. They have been strongly linked to Longstaff but he too is an unknown entity and is certainly not the level they require. For me, this is the biggest weakness and an area in which they will be found several times this year.
This is definitely a reason for concern for United and why we will not see them near the top 3 this year, but given the difficulties of Chelsea and Arsenal, the 4th place is theirs.
Adeel
Local teams – by travel time and flight availability
As for the local teams, I thought that it would be interesting to slightly modify the thought experience – focusing on travel times rather than distances. Especially with those of us who live abroad.
If I am not mistaken, Brentford FC is the local club of most of us residing outside of England, based on:
– flight to London Heathrow
– 0-15 minutes waiting for the tube
– 30 minutes Tube from Heathrow T5 to South Ealing
– 0-10 minutes waiting for the bus
– 10 minutes bus ride from South Ealing to Griffin Park
(Same logistics for the return trip, with the exception of the possibility of walking instead of taking the bus).
This means that foreign fans will be able to watch Brentford FC's Saturday 3-hour kickoff, without spending the night, provided your flight lands at LHR before 1 pm and leaves LHR after 6:30 pm.
For me personally, this means that I can leave my apartment in Switzerland at 10:30 CET and be at home at 11:15 pm CET. (I did it once – it was fun, but tiring!)
I imagine that other fans with other air links have similar route proposals. Geneva does not have frequent links with Manchester, Liverpool, Birmingham – but I bet that Irish and Scandinavian fans could do something similar "in the North". It is also possible to consider the same thing with Southend United, Crawley / Palace / Brighton (Gatwick) and Tottenham (Stansted).
I would be very surprised, however, if anyone could suggest a more convenient day trip than that of Brentford!
Oliver (in case you're wondering, I was coached by a friend obsessed with the show People Just Do Nothing) Dziggel, Geneva, Switzerland
Compare football transfers to pension transfers …
I am an badistant technical badistant in the pension sector (well, I hear!).
Having read your article on "ridiculous" transfer fees in football, I thought that one way to explain these badessments was like some pension transfers (yawn I hear you repeat but listen to me).
Pensions are very valuable and their savings and wise use are very important to individuals and depend on their own circumstances.
The two main types of pensions are defined benefit (DB) / final salary plans and defined contribution (DC) purchase plans.
Defined benefit plans provide guaranteed income at retirement, while defined contribution plans provide a pool that you can use to purchase various products / options and are more flexible.
Now, if you transfer a DB pension to a DC pension pot, you may be surprised at the high value of the CETV (cash transfer). However, you will abandon a valuable badet and invest in it if there are risks. However, it is easier to access and you can take it earlier, which makes it potentially more useful for you, depending on your situation.
Now, if you have a CETV worth £ 30,000 or more, which will probably be more than likely, even with a short service, financial advice is needed before the transfer because you give up a valuable badet.
If anyone is still awake: Zaha, for example, is a DB pension at the Palace while Arsenal wants it for his DC pot then, while I do not think it's worth it. hardly and that Arsenal should look elsewhere, I fully understand why Palace gives him value. price.
Seriously, I'm having more fun at the pub … honestly! ?
Chris, Croydon
The Champions League starts today
Most people who follow the English Premier League may have missed the fact that the Champions League starts today for all clubs that do not already benefit from an unprecedented financial chasm.
My adoptive club and previous winners of the former European Cup, PSV Eindhoven, are fortunate to be able to count on six matches in just three matches to qualify for the group stage! I have not added them all, but there will probably be more games before the start of the group stage than after.
If I look a bit bitter, it's because I am. For 25 years I have been living in the Netherlands, the Champions League has been progressively modified to the point where I am sure there are now fewer true European leagues in the main competition than non-champions.
The moment has certainly come to restore some balance. Balancing the number of major league clubs in the UEFA Champions League that I believe are the most money for UEFA (three per country are ample) with the minor leagues, move the fourth club to the Europa League and balance the prize money to make it a less ugly contest and therefore more attractive for television and the public.
Tim Royall GFC
England v Sweden
A little late with that but it's gone; a nice competition even if the American victories seemed a little in the image of Man U in the 90s / 00s. Note that they had an English coach and a Swedish badistant coach to get them there. 😉 First at the "absurd match" – it seems that matches in third place do not count … for the losers (see Argentina v Chile, where neither one nor the other does seemed worried before, then fought like crazy to win and both seemed not to worry about it after). So I would like to see Phil Neville tell the Swedish players that bronze does not matter, starting with Nilla Fischer. Yesterday, more than 20000 people gathered on a Gothenburg square to celebrate them on their way home (which equates to more than 100 000 in England) and it was live on TV. I know these things are relative (expectations, realistic or not), but it's an incredible World Cup bronze medal! Hell under some light it even looks gold! ?
The match itself was not great, but Sofia (let me go over !!!) Jakobsson's finish was good and Fran Kirby's goal was superb. Sweden has done well to win after losing three players due to injury and the third is (as a reminder, a great success).
The final was also a little disappointing, which is strange that the Netherlands are World Cup finalists, although they seemingly played badly all the competition. It is amusing to note that the ratings of readers of the BBC website counted every Dutch player above any American player and I did not find any comments on this from the BBC. The choice of Rapinoe by the BBC as player of the match (so good is it) is it political when Van Veenendaal scored 9 goals for the Netherlands?
Which brings me to my overall climax, usually the excellent goalkeeper. There is a lot of criticism about women's goalkeeping (as there were in African teams more than 20 years ago), but at the World Cup, there were some amazing performances. I hope this encourages girls to play in goals because (here at least) no one ever wants to play for goals!
For more girls to play football, you have to start young and change mentalities. Interestingly, my daughter is currently in a football camp in England and she said she immediately noticed that English boys were much more badist and derisory for girls than here. First step, clubs need to be trained so girls can play. I know friends in England who simply gave up because there was no team there.
I agree with others who said that girls should also be encouraged to watch football. There seem to be many complaints that men do not watch women's football ignoring the fact that few women watch women's football. In a country proud of its equality, the Damallsvenskan (first female division in Sweden) has an average gate of 908 and the Allsvenskan (men) has 9042! A crowd of 900 people will not support wages. Clubs need to be more active in schools and communities to get people to make matches.
Rob, from Sweden (Lucy Bronze did not win the bronze, but won the silver ball, which confuses …)
An XI to refuse to show up for work players
JC STFC wants an XI of the players who refused to show up for work. oh so I'm going to give you all one, a clbadic 3-4-3 training, just do not expect one of them to actually play a game for the team and do not disturb the locker room.
GK: Courtois (trying to force a move from Chelsea to Madrid)
DEF: Sebastian Squillaci (From Sevilla to Arsenal, refused to play a qualifying match for Sevilla in the Champions League because he knew it would tie him in, was it worth it?)
DEF: William Gallas (wanted more money, said that if he was played, he would score his own goals)
DEF: Marcos Rojo (Rojo refused to train at Sporting when he tried to force his transfer to Manchester United)
MID: Dimitri Payet (Back in Marseille after a strike in West Ham, he apparently did not like Bilic's style of play)
MID: Paul Scholes (in protest against Sir Alex Ferguson's team in the 3-1 defeat at Liverpool, maingro Ginger refused to play a League Cup draw at Arsenal later in the week )
MID: George Best (After losing three months after the defeat of Manchester United against QPR in January 1974, he only returned to be abandoned, then went on strike and refused to play until he was released. in November of this year, when FIFA supervised his release.)
MID: Kieron Dyer (The midfielder refused to play on the right side of the midfield during a match against Middlesbrough, in a series of results that led Sir Bobby to lose his position.)
FWD: Pierre Van Hooijdonk (He requested a transfer and, after a refusal, he simply decided not to come back and return to Holland to train with NAC Breda)
FWD: Dimitar Berbatov (Refused to play for Tottenham in a league game after being annoyed to be named on the bench, a year later he kicked a second shot in an attempt to force him to leave United. )
FWD: Diego Costa (Disappeared in Brazil after the infamous Conte texting saga, later sold to Atletico)
Mikey, CFC (Aside from defense, training is pretty solid)
[ad_2]
Source link
