[ad_1]
It is unlikely that Green's resolution will lead to a real vote on impeachment in the House, but it can force the House to act in accordance with House rules in both legislative days, creating a dilemma for the Democratic leaders of the House of Commons. the House and the moderate Democrats who have avoided the question of dismissal.
While Green said on Tuesday that he wants an upward or downward vote on articles of impeachment, the House has several options to get rid of his efforts, although each has drawbacks. The House could vote in favor of tabling or rescinding the resolution, but it would have the effect of putting the legislators on record of removal.
The House could also vote to refer the resolution to the Judiciary Committee, but the Republicans would probably oppose the vote, forcing the Democrats to vote in favor of the referral in order to take the resolution to the background.
House leaders did not say how they would handle the resolution on Tuesday until Green officially introduced it.
"It will be up to our management team to decide," said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi about Green's push for a vote.
"We have not really discussed how to get rid of it," said Majority Leader Steny Hoyer. "I'm not going to try to discourage him, you know, he has to do what he thinks is right."
Green had previously submitted privileged resolutions requiring a ground vote on impeachment in December 2017 and January 2018. In both cases, the Republican-led House decided to table the measure, voting respectively 354- 58 and 355-66.
But this is the first time Mr. Green has imposed a vote on the Democrats who control the House.
Democrats said on Tuesday that they understood Green's unshakable belief that the impeachment resolution was necessary, but they questioned the timing of the move: a week before the appearance of Special Advocate Robert Mueller and at an hour that the caucus recalls divided on the issue of dismissal.
"I can not control what another member does, it seems like it's going to happen, we'll just have to deal with it," said Illinois Representative Cheri Bustos, Campaign Group Leader. of the House.
"Look, what does it bring, I'm going to vote for." "Do I think it's the most strategic thing right now, without a game plan? Who knows," said Cedric's representative. Richmond, a Democrat from Louisiana.
Green told the leadership of the Democratic Party that he intended to present his resolution on Tuesday, adding that he thought the vote might be difficult for his colleagues, but that would not deter him.
"I believe that if we do not do it, the President will only intensify his shameful behavior," Green said. "It just seemed to me that we should submit these articles to the House of Representatives so that we can not only condemn him, but also indict him so that he understands that there are certain limits."
Although the debate on the dismissal of the Democratic caucus is largely about what Mueller discovered during his investigation, Green said he did not take it into account in his resolution this week.
Green stated that he would oppose voting either to table his resolution or to refer it to the Judiciary Committee, where the committee would not be required to take action.
"I think the normal procedure is to send it to our committee," said Tuesday the president of the Judiciary, Jerry Nadler, about Green's resolution.
This is what the Democrats did when Pelosi spoke in 2008 after the performance. Dennis Kucinich, a Democrat from Ohio, introduced a resolution to dismiss President George W. Bush. The measure was referred to the committee by a vote of 251 to 166, with 24 Republicans joining the Democrats to dismiss her.
Green is not the only one to call for additional measures as a result of Tuesday's vote in the House following Trump's tweets. Representative Steve Cohen, a Tennessee Democrat who had argued for impeachment, said he had tabled a resolution to formally censor the president for his tweets.
But Cohen also supported Green's dismissal campaign.
"I would certainly vote for that, whether it's cautious or not, it's not up to me to check it," he said. "I think it's the right thing to do."
This story has been updated with additional developments on Tuesday.
Manu Raju, Lauren Fox and Phil Mattingly from CNN contributed to this report.
[ad_2]Source link
