[ad_1]
A doctor who claimed to have invented a procedure to "reverse" abortion falsely claims for years an affiliation to a prestigious American medical school, may reveal the Guardian.
Medication abortion or "self-managed" abortion is an FDA-approved procedure and is administered in two doses over a 48-hour period. According to the Guttmacher Institute, medical abortions now account for almost one-third of all abortions in the country. There is no inversion procedure.
But Dr. George Delgado, Medical Director of Culture of Life Family Services in San Diego, claims to have invented a "reversal", in which women receive a large dose of progesterone after the first dose of a medical abortion.
Delgado's claims about the "overthrow" procedure have been denounced as "unproven and unethical" in a statement by the largest American badociation of doctors, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. His work has been described as an "unsupervised research experiment" in an article in the New England Journal of Medicine.
Despite the condemnation of the medical community, some Republican state legislators have adopted Delgado's demands as part of a wider campaign to undermine women's reproductive rights. Lawmakers in North Dakota recently pbaded a law requiring doctors to tell patients that drugs for abortion are reversible, the fifth state to do so by 2019.
The American Medical Association is now prosecuting North Dakota for forcing doctors to "misinform patients that medical abortion can be" reversible ", which is contrary to science," and said the law required "Doctors to[to] convey ideological messages, false or misleading, prescribed by the government ".
Delgado announced his affiliation with the University of California at San Diego (UCSD) even after the university asked him to stop last year.
Delgado worked in the UCSD family medicine department as a volunteer clinical badociate professor from 2005, but left in June 2011, according to the school. The school is unable to describe the extent of Delgado's duties, but stated that his position was unpaid and that he might have been "as little as teaching a clbad once per year, "said University spokesperson Scott LaFee.
Since 2011, Delgado has been a member of the Culture of Life Family Service Clinic in California, where he provides "pro-life" Catholic medicine. The clinic announces "Christ centered medical care".
Culture of Life family clinics in Escondido and San Diego, California, have been included in the successful applications for federal government funding for family planning approved by the Trump administration. Both clinics were listed as "sub-recipients" in a $ 5.9 million grant proposal submitted to the Trump administration by the Obria group. Obria would later receive $ 1.7 million a year.
The Obria Group, through the Republican CRC Public Relations Crisis Communication Society, said clinics were not on the "final list" of sub-recipients of the $ 1.7 million grant , without specifying which clinics were on the final list. CRC also stated that the "reversal" of abortion is "non-repayable under the Title X program".
The Guardian has repeatedly attempted to contact the Culture of Life Family Service Clinic, but an office manager has not responded to several phone inquiries.
In the grant proposal, Culture of Life Family Services is committed to supporting 750 low-income women seeking family planning services. The amount of federal funds that the clinic would have received is specified in a copy of the federal grant application seen by the Guardian.
Delgado appears to have listed an affiliation with the USCD since 2011, including in a case report published in December 2012 in the Annals of Pharmacotherapy and, as recently as November 2018, in a biography of the United States. intervener published on the Catholic Answers website. This affiliation listed in Catholic Answers has been removed as a result of Guardian investigations.
The Charlotte Lozier Institute Against Abortion website also referred to Delgado as "Associate Clinical Associate Professor in the Faculty of Medicine of UCSD" at the time of publication. It is not, said three university officials.
In response to questions from the Guardian sent via email, Delgado said: "As soon as I received a copy of the letter from [University of California San Diego] I have stopped listing an affiliation with UCSD. "He added that websites still listing affiliates" had to use old quotes in their documents ".
He declined an interview request due to "professional responsibilities" and did not respond to inquiries sent by email, including federal funding.
Delgado's most recent work includes speeches offering pseudo-scientific coverage to attacking anti-abortion activists medical abortions as they develop. Delgado also pushed the false claim that abortion is linked to bad cancer.
The UCSD medical school said that Delgado "had been instructed" by his former department to stop using the school's name after citing it as his affiliation in an April 2018 article, largely criticized and briefly retracted.
When the article was again published, Delgado cited the Steno Institute as his research institute. On July 24, 2018, the Steno Institute was registered with the California State Secretary by Delgado, with the mission "to continue the reversal of abortion pills and other research pro -life".
While inversion of the abortion pill is often described as a "cure" in press releases from anti-abortion groups, Delgado has only published a case report of six patients in one medical journal.
According to the New England Journal of Medicine, another article published by Delgado in a parallel legal journal, Issue in Law & Medicine, was temporarily withdrawn for overestimating the level of examination by an institutional review panel.
"In the end, there is no evidence that this treatment is effective," said Dr. Daniel Grossman, professor of gynecology at the Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health at the University of California at San Francisco.
Grossman wrote an badysis published last year in the New England Journal of Medicine describing Delgado's work as an "unsupervised research experiment" and adding that laws requiring doctors to tell women about it were "an intrusion disturbing in the relationship between doctors and their patients. .
He told The Guardian, "This is clearly a research, and it must be done through an institutional review committee or an independent review committee.
"Patients must obtain informed consent for any research they may be involved in to understand the risks, benefits, benefits and alternatives to this experimental treatment."
Medical abortions are based on two medications taken 48 hours apart to induce abortion: mifepristone followed by misoprostol. Mifepristone blocks progesterone, which disrupts pregnancy. The second drug is needed because some studies have found that a job termination would not succeed in 48% of women.
Source link
