Data theft in Capital One: the United States stop their 'hacker' | News | DW



[ad_1]

The US federal authorities on Monday night arrested a computer hacker, nicknamed "erratic", accused of stealing personal information from more than 100 million Capital One credit card applications.

Europol has identified the financial sector as one of the most vulnerable to cyber attacks, especially those that result in data breaches.

Read more: Europe's cyber security deficit threatens infrastructure and elections

What we know about the hack:

  • Those affected include 100 million people in the United States and 6 million in Canada.
  • The victims were mainly consumers and small businesses.
  • Information on credit limits, balances, transaction information and social security numbers has been compromised.
  • Capital One discovered the breach on July 19th.
  • "Other entities" other than Capital One may have been targeted.

Read more: Germany struggles to boost cyber defense

& # 39; Deeply sorry & # 39;

The US Attorney's Office in Washington said: "The intrusion occurred via a poorly configured web application firewall that allowed access to the data."

According to court documents, the suspect reportedly told another Twitter user: "I basically tied myself up with a bomb-proof vest, dropped the Capital One character and admitted it."

Capital One Chief Executive Officer Richard Fairback said in a statement: "While I am grateful that the author was arrested, I am deeply sorry for what happened. I sincerely apologize for the understandable concern that this incident must cause to those affected and I undertake to remedy it. "

Read more: Cybersecurity: Why it's "hard to protect yourself" online

What do we know about the suspect? She is a former software engineer for a Seattle-based technology company. She shared the data on the website hosting code, GitHub.

What happens next? If the suspect is found guilty, he incurs up to five years in prison and a fine of up to $ 250,000. Capitol One stated that it would provide free credit monitoring and identity protection to those concerned.

Read more: Estonia strengthens cybersecurity with the world's first data embbady

Increasing problem

The data breach in Capital One comes a week after Equifax, an American credit monitoring agency, has agreed to pay up to $ 700 million for a data breach exposing personal information of more than 145 million customers.

Authorities are still debating whether and how companies should be held accountable for data breaches, especially when the personal data of millions of citizens are compromised.

Every evening, DW editors send a selection of hard news and quality journalism. You can register to receive it directly here.

  • Apps on a smartphone

    Fight for the internet: social media, governments and technology companies

    Freedom of expression or illegal content?

    Whether it is hate speech, propaganda or activism, governments around the world have stepped up their efforts to prevent content deemed illegal to circulate on social networks. Whether it's lengthy lawsuits or blanket bans, DW looks at how some countries are trying to stop the flow of illegal content, while others are trying to regulate the media social.

  • Posts in a German Facebook account

    Fight for the internet: social media, governments and technology companies

    Social Media Act

    After a public debate in Germany, a new law on social media came into effect in October. The legislation imposes heavy fines on social media companies, such as Facebook, for failing to remove hate speech publications. Facebook and other social media companies have complained about the law, saying that strict rules could lead to unnecessary censorship.

  • Google sign with silhouettes of people

    Fight for the internet: social media, governments and technology companies

    Right to be forgotten

    In 2014, the European Court of Justice stated that European citizens have the right to ask search engines, such as Google and Bing, to remove "inaccurate, inappropriate, inappropriate or excessive" search results related to their search. name. Although Google complied with the decision, it did so reluctantly, warning that it could make the Internet as "free as the least free place in the world".

  • Young Ukrainians protest against the ban on Russian social media platforms and web services

    Fight for the internet: social media, governments and technology companies

    General prohibition

    In May 2017, Ukraine imposed sanctions on Russian social media platforms and web services. The general ban affected millions of Ukrainian citizens, many of whom were worried about their data. This decision prompted young Ukrainians to demonstrate in the streets, calling on the government to restore access to platforms including VKontakte (VK), the largest social network in Russia.

  • Max Schrems awaits the verdict of the European Court of Justice

    Fight for the internet: social media, governments and technology companies

    Safe Harbor

    In 2015, the Court of Justice of the European Communities ruled that the Safe Harbor, a 15-year pact between the United States and the European Union that allowed the transfer of personal data without prior authorization, was in invalid reality. Max Schrems, a student in Austrian law, opened the legal proceedings against Facebook in response to the revelations of former NSA subcontractor Edward Snowden.

  • Chinese social media services

    Fight for the internet: social media, governments and technology companies

    settlement

    In China, the use of social media is heavily regulated by the government. Beijing has effectively blocked access to thousands of websites and platforms, including Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and Pinterest. Instead, China offers its citizens access to local social media platforms, such as Weibo and WeChat, which have hundreds of millions of monthly users.

  • Twitter logo displayed on a mobile phone (picture-alliance / Photo AP / M. Rourke)

    Fight for the internet: social media, governments and technology companies

    Twitter bans accounts related to Russia

    Many politicians and media attribute Russia's influence to Donald Trump's victory in the 2016 elections. Moscow reportedly used Facebook, Twitter, Google and Instagram to influence public opinion on key issues. In October 2017, Twitter suspended more than 2,750 accounts due to alleged Russian propaganda. The platform also banned the commercials of RT (formerly Russia Today) and the Sputnik news agency.

  • Option of the Facebook application on a phone screen (Photo Alliance / NurPhoto / J. Arriens)

    Fight for the internet: social media, governments and technology companies

    Facebook announces a tool related to propaganda

    While social media was under pressure to allow alleged Russian interference, Facebook announced a new project to combat such efforts in November 2017. The next page will allow users to check whether they have "liked" or not. They followed an alleged propaganda account on Facebook or Instagram. In the meantime, Facebook has been criticized for not protecting users' data as a result of the Cambridge Analytica scandal.

    Author: Lewis Sanders IV (dj)


ls / rt (AP, AFP)

[ad_2]
Source link