The British find it unfair that taxpayers' money is funding the renovation of their home by Meghan Markle and Prince Harry & # 39; s



[ad_1]

The British find it extremely annoying to see their money spent on major renovations to Meghan Markle and Prince Harry. Although they were distracted by the kindness of Baby Archie, residents have not forgotten the money invested in updating Frogmore Cottage, and they are not happy.

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry have been criticized for their home improvement projects

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry
Meghan Markle and Prince Harry | Samir Hussein / WireImage

When it was learned that Markle wanted a yoga studio in his new home with spring floor, taxpayers were justifiably upset. Critics have argued that it would be better to spend money to support the country's education system.

The truth is that Frogmore Cottage had to undergo a series of much more serious upgrades, including heating, ventilation, electricity and plumbing. These problems must be solved no matter who will live there and the property was badigned to renovations long before the Queen offered the cottage to Prince Harry and Markle. The property needed completely new water and gas lines and much of its exterior was in poor condition.

On top of that, the house also needed structural repairs. The support beams were to be replaced, the floor joists supported and what was once five separate residences was transformed into a single family home. The couple would also have installed a more efficient green energy system to support the existing electrical infrastructure.

The cost of renovations was largely covered by taxpayers' money

When the Royal Family's official financial reports were released, it was revealed that the renovations at Frogmore Cottage cost taxpayers almost $ 4 million. This immediately put Markle in the line of fire for ludicrous about how the money was spent.

Graham Smith, a Republican activist, was one of the most outspoken critics. He helped dispel the fury of taxpayers by announcing, "The increases this year are outrageous in this period of widespread cuts in spending. If even a school or hospital is facing cuts, we can not justify spending a dime in royals … intense financial pressure, we are launching 2.4 million pounds in a new house for Harry. "

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry funded many of the smallest personal details of their home

Sir Michael Stevens, Privy Purse goalkeeper, defended the young duchess. Stevens is the guy who is responsible for all accounts held by the royal family. He said: "The property has not been the subject of work for some years and had already been badigned to a renovation, in accordance with our responsibility to maintain the state of the estate of the occupied royal palaces … The Sovereign Grant covered the work undertaken to transform the building. in the official residence and home of the Duke and Duchess of Susbad and their new family. "

The monarchy would therefore maintain the property to ensure its longevity, even if Markle and Prince Harry did not plan to live there. In addition, according to Stevens, all expenses, fancy fixtures and custom work were paid by Markle and Prince Harry's money and not by the tax base.

Thus, cosmetic changes and personal taste in decorating were probably left to the young couple. This probably included Markle's choice of vegan painting and also ended in their new luxury kitchen. The structural changes and even the soundproofing of the windows were probably financed by the grant from the monarchy.

There are still many projects to complete

Royal sources indicate that there are still many projects to be completed at Frogmore Cottage, but the costs of these will not be revealed yet. According to the palace officials, the exterior painting of the property is part of a five-year maintenance plan and will be calculated in future financial reports. Landscaping and other outdoor projects remain on the to-do list.

[ad_2]
Source link