[ad_1]
Traditionally, Oscar voters have honored smaller roles in the Best Supporting Actress category, especially compared to the corresponding male role. The average supporting female performance lasts only 24 minutes and 37 seconds, with the majority falling below 22 minutes. Still, a decent number of features have always been recognized, including six that hit the screen hours mark. Here’s a look at the 10 longest (and here are the 10 longest winners):
ten. Jennifer jason leigh (“The Hateful Eight”)
57 minutes, 45 seconds (34.46% of movie)
The group of nominees for Best Supporting Actress in 2016 has the highest average screen time (51 minutes and 46 seconds) in the history of the two supporting categories. Leigh, Rooney mara (“Carol”) and winner Alicia vikander (“The Danish Girl”) simultaneously won places on this list and all of them sparked controversy by appearing to have been placed in the wrong category. As rude outlaw Daisy Domergue, Leigh plays the only major female character in “The Hateful Eight” and has the second highest screen time in the film after Samuel L. Jackson, which points to one hour, 11 minutes and 50 seconds.
9. Barbara bel geddes (“I remember mom”)
58 minutes, 10 seconds (43.36% of movie)
In 1949, Bel Geddes caught the attention of Oscar voters with his second film role as young aspiring author Katrin Hanson. As a narrator, she is featured in nearly an hour of the film, which placed hers among the ten longest nominated performances in either of the supporting categories until 1966. She lost the price at Claire Trevor, who won on his second of three offers for his 17 minutes and 12 seconds of screen time in “Key Largo.”
8. Kate winslet (“Sense and sensitivity”)
59 minutes, 32 seconds (43.73% of movie)
Although Winslet was part of the women’s support lineup in 2016, her performance of 39 minutes and 41 seconds in “Steve Jobs” is generally considered to fall into the category. However, his supporting nomination for “Sense and Sensibility” from 1995 sparked much debate. She managed to avoid further scrutiny when another defensible lead, Mira Sorvino, won the award for her performance of 35 minutes and six seconds in “Mighty Aphrodite”. Of her seven nominated performances, including four in the main category, Winslet’s lap as Marianne Dashwood remains the second longest, surpassed only by her “Titanic” screen time of one hour, 26 minutes and 29 seconds.
SEE Oscars 2021 Predictions: Best Supporting Actress
7. Alicia Vikander (“The Danish Girl”)
59 minutes, 37 seconds (49.88% of movie)
As an artist Gerda Wegener, Vikander earned her only Oscar nomination and victory in 2016, beating a list of actresses whose screen times range from 31 to 71 minutes. She appeared in half of her film and received almost as much narrative attention as her co-star, Eddie redmayne, making its placement in the category a controversial topic throughout awards season. Prior to her Oscar victory, she won supporting trophies at the SAG and Critics Choice Awards. Voters in the Golden Globe and BAFTAs, however, have named her as the leader. While controversy and confusion could have easily hurt his campaign, the quality of his performance and his impressive body of work that year (including a lauded role in winner of Best Visual Effects “Ex Machina”) got him earned the victory.
6. Hailee Steinfeld (“True courage”)
1 hour, 0 minutes, 21 seconds (54.76% of movie)
The Coen brothers“True Grit” was the second adaptation of the novel of the same name, the first being released in 1969. John wayne starred in the original film and won an Oscar for Best Actor for his one hour, 10 minutes and 47 seconds onscreen time as Rooster Cogburn. 21 years old Kim darby, playing teenager Mattie Ross, appears within an hour, 24 minutes and 22 seconds of the film. Both roles were cut short in the 2010 release, but 14-year-old Ross of Steinfeld still maintains a lead of almost 12 minutes. Jeff BridgesCogburn. She remains one of six supporting actresses to be nominated for spending at least an hour on screen, two of whom were also children at the time of their nomination.
5. Marianne Jean-Baptiste (“Secrets and Lies”)
1 hour, 0 minutes, 38 seconds (42.78% of movie)
Jean-Baptiste won his first and only Oscar nomination for her role as Hortense Cumberbatch, a black optometrist who learns her birth mother is a white factory worker. It was his first major film role and the academy’s recognition launched a stable career. Brenda Blethyn was nominated in the main category for playing the main character, and their screen times are separated by just 38 seconds. In the end, Jean-Baptiste lost against Juliette Binoche, whose screen time in the 1996 Best Picture winner “The English Patient” totals 42 minutes and four seconds.
TO PREDICT Oscar nominations 2021 until March 15
4. Patty duke (“The miracle worker”)
1 hour, 5 minutes, 43 seconds (61.67% of movie)
In 1963, Duke won an Oscar for his portrayal of Helen keller, a role she created on the Broadway stage. At 16, she made history as the first of three children to win an Oscar for acting. At the time, only two younger actresses had ever received nominations: 11 years old Patty mccormack (“The Bad Seed”) and 14 years old Bonita Granville (“These three”). Duke directly competed and prevailed over a third 10-year-old Mary badham (“Kill a mockingbird”). His performance also broke the record for the longest win in either support category, with more than half of all winners leading up to this point, not even having hit their time. screen of nearly 66 minutes.
3. Tatum o’neal (“Moon Paper”)
1 hour, 6 minutes, 58 seconds (65.49% of movie)
11 years after Duke’s pioneering victory, her age and screen time records were both broken by 10-year-old O’Neal when she won on her film debut as Addie Loggins. After Ann blyth (“Mildred Pierce”) and Brandon deWilde (“Shane”), she became the third and newest child actor to compete directly with an adult actor in the same film. His candidate colleague, Madeline Kahn, appears in just nine minutes and 50 seconds of “Paper Moon”, making her 19th shortest performance ever to be nominated in the category at the time. In terms of screen time, O’Neal not only stood out among its competition, but also passed four of the year’s main nominees, including the winner for Best Actress. Glenda jackson (“A touch of class”).
2. Rooney Mara (“Carol”)
1 hour, 10 minutes, 37 seconds (59.67% of movie)
Mara won her first supporting nomination in 2016 to play Therese Belivet, an aspiring photographer who has an affair with an older married woman. Despite 11 minutes and almost 10% more screen time than winner Alicia Vikander, her supporting placement was more solidified that year, with only Golden Globe voters ranking her first. However, with her having the highest screen time on the lineup and nearly six minutes longer than her nominated co-star, Cate Blanchett, puts her at the forefront of the fraud discourse in the 2016 category. Her performance is even nine minutes and over 20% more than that which she gives in “The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo”, which her earned a nomination for best actress in 2012.
1. Jennifer jones (“Since you left”)
1 hour, 15 minutes, 38 seconds (42.73% of movie)
After a 12-year break, 65 Ethel Barrymore Her career had a resurgence when she won the award for Best Supporting Actress in 1945 for her role of 24 minutes and 19 seconds in “None but the Lonely Heart”. At the time, she was the oldest woman to win an acting Oscar, beating contestants between the ages of 19 and 45. The group included Jones, 25, who had just won the Best Actress award for “The Song of Bernadette” the year before for a performance five minutes shorter than this one. Although she missed out on a second trophy, she managed to make history as the first female supporting contestant to pass the on-screen hour mark, and she’s been at the top of this list for over 75 years old. She ended her career with a total of five nominations, this one remaining the second longest of her nominated performances despite being the only one to be placed in the supporting category.
Make your Gold Derby predictions now. Download our free and easy app for Apple / iPhone or Android devices (Google Play) to compete against legions of other fans as well as our experts and editors to get the best prediction accuracy scores. See our latest prediction champions. Can you dominate our estimated rankings next? Always remember to keep your predictions up to date as they impact our latest on-tour odds, which terrifies chefs and Hollywood stars. Don’t miss the fun. Express yourself and share your huffy opinions on our famous forums where 5,000 showbiz leaders hide out every day to keep up with the latest rewards. Everyone wants to know: what do you think? Who are you planning and why?
Source link
